Skip to content

Disable RequireExplicitNullMarking#3403

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
esword/disable-RequireExplicitNullMarking
Dec 4, 2025
Merged

Disable RequireExplicitNullMarking#3403
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
esword/disable-RequireExplicitNullMarking

Conversation

@esword
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@esword esword commented Dec 4, 2025

Before this PR

per internal thread on our support channel, this check was added to nullaway by mistake and is flooding logs - uber/NullAway#1363

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

@changelog-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changelog-app Bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type (Select exactly one)

  • Feature (Adding new functionality)
  • Improvement (Improving existing functionality)
  • Fix (Fixing an issue with existing functionality)
  • Break (Creating a new major version by breaking public APIs)
  • Deprecation (Removing functionality in a non-breaking way)
  • Migration (Automatically moving data/functionality to a new system)

Description

Disable RequireExplicitNullMarking

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@changelog-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changelog-app Bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Successfully generated changelog entry!

Need to regenerate?

Simply interact with the changelog bot comment again to regenerate these entries.


📋Changelog Preview

💡 Improvements

  • Disable RequireExplicitNullMarking (#3403)

@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot Bot merged commit e3f580b into develop Dec 4, 2025
5 checks passed
@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot Bot deleted the esword/disable-RequireExplicitNullMarking branch December 4, 2025 14:19
@autorelease3
Copy link
Copy Markdown

autorelease3 Bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Released 6.79.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants