Skip to content

refactor(transformer/class-properties): TODO comments for future optimizations #7711

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
graphite-app merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2024
Merged

refactor(transformer/class-properties): TODO comments for future optimizations #7711

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions crates/oxc_transformer/src/es2022/class_properties/constructor.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ impl<'a, 'c> ConstructorParamsSuperReplacer<'a, 'c> {
// TODO(improve-on-babel): When not in loose mode, inits are `_defineProperty(this, propName, value)`.
// `_defineProperty` returns `this`, so last statement could be `return _defineProperty(this, propName, value)`,
// rather than an additional `return this` statement.
// Actually this wouldn't work at present, as `_classPrivateFieldInitSpec(this, _prop, value)`
// does not return `this`. We could alter it so it does when we have our own helper package.
fn create_super_func(inits: Vec<Expression<'a>>, ctx: &mut TraverseCtx<'a>) -> Expression<'a> {
let outer_scope_id = ctx.current_scope_id();
let super_func_scope_id = ctx.scopes_mut().add_scope(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -534,6 +536,8 @@ impl<'a, 'c> ConstructorBodyInitsInserter<'a, 'c> {
// TODO(improve-on-babel): When not in loose mode, inits are `_defineProperty(this, propName, value)`.
// `_defineProperty` returns `this`, so last statement could be `return _defineProperty(this, propName, value)`,
// rather than an additional `return this` statement.
// Actually this wouldn't work at present, as `_classPrivateFieldInitSpec(this, _prop, value)`
// does not return `this`. We could alter it so it does when we have our own helper package.
let super_call = create_super_call(&args_binding, ctx);
let this_expr = ctx.ast.expression_this(SPAN);
let body_exprs = ctx.ast.expression_sequence(
Expand Down