📖 Use new project name in Copyright notices#2505
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2505 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 40.70% 40.70%
=======================================
Files 115 115
Lines 9593 9593
=======================================
Hits 3905 3905
Misses 5409 5409
Partials 279 279 |
Signed-off-by: Arnaud J Le Hors <[email protected]>
7dcd025 to
104d75a
Compare
|
Integration tests success for |
|
Just curious, how did you generate the changes? I spot checked the 481 changes with some |
|
Integration tests success for |
spencerschrock
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. Everything looked normal when checking with:
git diff upstream/main | grep "^+" | grep -v "^+++" | grep -vi Copyright
And got a LGTM in the other PR too: #2428 (comment)
Sorry for the late reply, I'm in Europe at the moment. The command I used was: faq.md had to be excluded because it contains the last occurence of "security scorecard" in the entry about the change of name and doesn't have a copyright notice (maybe that should be fixed). Thanks for reviewing and approving this PR. |
Signed-off-by: Arnaud J Le Hors <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnaud J Le Hors <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnaud J Le Hors [email protected]
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This is a followup to PR #2428. This PR updates all the copyright notices to use the new project name OpenSSF Scorecard.
What is the current behavior?
Copyright attributed to: "Security Scorecard Authors"
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?**
Copyright attributed to: "OpenSSF Scorecard Authors"
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
NONE
Special notes for your reviewer
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Only when it comes to the copyright in the source and documentation.