-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
[#68700] Rename to weighted item list #20867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#68700] Rename to weighted item list #20867
Conversation
Renames `scored_list` to `weighted_item_list`
…tation/68700-rename-to-weighted-item-list
- add migration for db column name - update AR relations in code - update display texts and locale keys - update test, method, class, variable names - fix formatting mistake in item base controller
698a562 to
38d5222
Compare
Generated by 🚫 Danger |
- fix migration to rename existing data in custom fields table - update project custom fields header to show all custom fields with enterprise addon - show upsale page for hierarchies and weighted item lists
machisuji
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Migration looks safe enough. (no comment on the rest of the code)
We will still do another migration test run just to be safe, though. Please tag @cbliard when this is merged so he can do it.
f5d1ac3 to
16db2c1
Compare
- replaced images - added enterprise addon for test setups
16db2c1 to
d9a8aef
Compare
f74bcd8 to
8041b7c
Compare
8041b7c to
4ec3810
Compare
ba1ash
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
NobodysNightmare
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See my initial batch of comments from code review. I'll quickly click through the changes before giving out an approval.
Co-authored-by: Jan Sandbrink <[email protected]>
|
I wanted to talk to dominc about that today. The same is true for calculated values and I adopted the behaviour from there to save time. I think we need some fixing there, but not yet sure how. And maybe that is fine for 16.6.1? |


Ticket
#68700
What are you trying to accomplish?
Hints