Skip to content

Conversation

@aparcar
Copy link
Member

@aparcar aparcar commented Oct 4, 2022

This causes more issues than good. The server must only provide such information and the client should request the user what do to or may "auto default" to what package_changes suggest.

Changing this on the server side confuses clients that compare the requested list of packages with the resulting list of packages.

Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren [email protected]

This causes more issues than good. The server must only provide such
information and the client should request the user what do to or may
"auto default" to what `package_changes` suggest.

Changing this on the server side confuses clients that compare the
requested list of packages with the resulting list of packages.

Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren <[email protected]>
@aparcar
Copy link
Member Author

aparcar commented Oct 4, 2022

CC: @dangowrt I'll implement this for LuCI, please do so for auc

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 85.08% // Head: 84.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.37% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (d6cd7b8) compared to base (e5965b2).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #402      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.08%   84.71%   -0.38%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines        1153     1138      -15     
==========================================
- Hits          981      964      -17     
- Misses        172      174       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
asu/api.py 71.03% <ø> (-1.07%) ⬇️
tests/test_api.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
asu/build.py 77.50% <0.00%> (-1.00%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@aparcar aparcar merged commit 0039fbd into openwrt:master Oct 9, 2022
@aparcar aparcar deleted the no-replaces branch October 9, 2022 21:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant