Upgraded the RDS instance type for the Test environment to improve performance.

[vladsha-dev]

The RDS instance type for the Test environment has been upgraded to db.t3.2xlarge to handle search requests across over 1.2 million production locations now present in the database.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The RDS instance type for the test environment was updated from "db.t3.xlarge" to "db.t3.2xlarge" in the Terraform variables file. The release notes were also revised to document this change, noting the increased capacity to support a larger dataset in the test environment.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
deployment/environments/terraform-test.tfvars	Updated RDS instance type from "db.t3.xlarge" to "db.t3.2xlarge" for the test environment.
doc/release/RELEASE-NOTES.md	Added a note about the RDS instance upgrade in the test environment for version 2.7.0 release.

Possibly related PRs

• [OSDEV-1171] Decrease RDS instance type for staging and test #399: Decreases the RDS instance size in test and staging environments, modifying the same configuration variable but in the opposite direction.
• Right-sized ECS and RDS resources #459: Reduces RDS instance sizes and ECS/Fargate resources across multiple environments, including test, directly relating to RDS instance type changes in test.
• Updated RDS instance for prod, preprod and test #422: Updates RDS instance types for several environments, including test, but to different instance sizes, indicating related configuration changes.

Suggested reviewers

• VadimKovalenkoSNF
• Innavin369

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ce7c28 and e9771dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• deployment/environments/terraform-test.tfvars (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• deployment/environments/terraform-test.tfvars

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)

• GitHub Check: run-eslint-linter-and-prettier-formatter
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-contricleaner-cov
• GitHub Check: run-integration-test-code-quality
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-dd-cov
• GitHub Check: run-contricleaner-code-quality
• GitHub Check: run-django-code-quality
• GitHub Check: run-flake8-linter
• GitHub Check: run-dd-code-quality
• GitHub Check: run-countries-code-quality
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-countries-cov
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-fe-cov
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-django-cov
• GitHub Check: run-fe-code-quality

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

doc/release/RELEASE-NOTES.md (1)

94-94: Consider referencing the Terraform variables file or associated issue
The note correctly documents the Test RDS instance upgrade. To improve traceability, you might link to the updated deployment/environments/terraform-test.tfvars file or reference the internal ticket/PR number.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5be71b5 and 3ce7c28.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• deployment/environments/terraform-test.tfvars (1 hunks)
• doc/release/RELEASE-NOTES.md (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)

• GitHub Check: run-eslint-linter-and-prettier-formatter
• GitHub Check: run-dd-code-quality
• GitHub Check: run-integration-test-code-quality
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-contricleaner-cov
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-django-cov
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-countries-cov
• GitHub Check: run-flake8-linter
• GitHub Check: run-contricleaner-code-quality
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-dd-cov
• GitHub Check: run-countries-code-quality
• GitHub Check: run-django-code-quality
• GitHub Check: get-base-branch-fe-cov
• GitHub Check: run-fe-code-quality

🔇 Additional comments (1)

deployment/environments/terraform-test.tfvars (1)

19-19: Upgrade RDS instance type for Test env looks good
The bump to db.t3.2xlarge will provide the needed capacity for >1.2 M locations.
Please run a Terraform plan/apply against the Test backend to confirm there’s no unintended drift or downtime.

[barecheck]

React App | Jest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 34.49%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

[barecheck]

Dedupe Hub App | Unittest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 55.73%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

[roman-stolar]

Approved.

[barecheck]

Countries App | Unittest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 100%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

[barecheck]

Contricleaner App | Unittest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 98.75%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

[barecheck]

Django App | Unittest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 80.76%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud