Skip to content

[OSDEV-1697] Redirect to the main page from close dialog button#508

Merged
VadimKovalenkoSNF merged 10 commits intomainfrom
OSDEV-1697-protect-against-creation-of-multiple-moderation-events
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

[OSDEV-1697] Redirect to the main page from close dialog button#508
VadimKovalenkoSNF merged 10 commits intomainfrom
OSDEV-1697-protect-against-creation-of-multiple-moderation-events

Conversation

@VadimKovalenkoSNF
Copy link
Contributor

@VadimKovalenkoSNF VadimKovalenkoSNF commented Feb 11, 2025

Fix OSDEV-1697

  1. Apply redirect to the main page from close dialog button.
  2. Apply redirect to the beginning of SLC flow (contribute/single-location?tab=os-id) when click browser's back button.

@VadimKovalenkoSNF VadimKovalenkoSNF self-assigned this Feb 11, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@VadimKovalenkoSNF has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e653f53 and d0123b3.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • doc/release/RELEASE-NOTES.md (1 hunks)
  • src/react/src/__tests__/components/ProductionLocationDialog.test.js (2 hunks)
  • src/react/src/components/Contribute/ProductionLocationDialog.jsx (5 hunks)
  • src/react/src/components/Contribute/ProductionLocationDialogCloseButton.jsx (2 hunks)
  • src/react/src/components/Contribute/ProductionLocationInfo.jsx (0 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the release notes and modifies several React components handling the production location dialog. It adds a specific bug fix entry in the release notes for OSDEV-1697 and adjusts the dialog’s control flow. The changes remove the handleShow prop in favor of a new handleGoToMainPage function used during dialog closure. The modifications update related prop types and remove the state update function previously passed from the parent component, thereby altering how the dialog’s closure behavior triggers navigation to the main page.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
doc/release/RELEASE-NOTES.md Added a detailed bug fix entry for release 2.0.0 addressing OSDEV-1697; replaced the generic placeholder with specific redirection behavior upon closing the SLC modal.
src/react/.../ProductionLocationDialog.jsx, src/react/.../ProductionLocationDialogCloseButton.jsx, src/react/.../ProductionLocationInfo.jsx Removed the handleShow prop and replaced it with handleGoToMainPage; updated the onClick actions and prop types in dialog components; removed the direct state update function from ProductionLocationInfo for controlling dialog visibility.
src/react/.../ProductionLocationDialog.test.js Updated test suite to remove useHistory mock; changed test case to verify redirection to the main page upon clicking the close button; simplified test structure by removing unnecessary complexity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant CLB as ProductionLocationDialogCloseButton
    participant Router as Main Page Router

    U->>CLB: Click close button
    CLB->>Router: Invoke handleGoToMainPage()
    Router-->>U: Navigate to main page
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • Innavin369
  • vladsha-dev
  • roman-stolar
  • mazursasha1990

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@barecheck
Copy link

barecheck bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Dedupe Hub App | Unittest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 56.14%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

@barecheck
Copy link

barecheck bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Contricleaner App | Unittest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 98.91%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

@barecheck
Copy link

barecheck bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Countries App | Unittest test suite - Code coverage report

Total: 100%

Your code coverage diff: 0.00% ▴

✅ All code changes are covered

roman-stolar
roman-stolar previously approved these changes Feb 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@roman-stolar roman-stolar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@mazursasha1990 mazursasha1990 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general, looks good.
Left comments about improvements.

mazursasha1990
mazursasha1990 previously approved these changes Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mazursasha1990 mazursasha1990 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@mazursasha1990 mazursasha1990 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants