Skip to content

Feature: OpenShift Virtualization Higher Density #1679

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
iholder101 wants to merge 22 commits into from
Closed

Feature: OpenShift Virtualization Higher Density #1679

iholder101 wants to merge 22 commits into from

Conversation

@iholder101
Copy link

@iholder101 iholder101 commented Sep 17, 2024

A feature describing OpenShift Virtualization's path to higher density based on:

This is a replacement for #1630.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 17, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Hi @iholder101. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 17, 2024
@iholder101 iholder101 marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2024 11:02
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 17, 2024
@iholder101 iholder101 mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2024
Closed
@iholder101
Copy link
Author

iholder101 commented Sep 17, 2024

/cc @enp0s3 @Barakmor1 @fabiand @mrunalp @haircommander @kannon92

haircommander
haircommander reviewed Sep 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
enhancements/kubelet/virtualization-higher-workload-density.md Outdated

#### Timeline

* GA higher workload density in OpenShift Virtualization in 2024
Copy link
Member

@haircommander haircommander Sep 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this timeline still accurate?

Copy link
Author

@iholder101 iholder101 Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I believe it is.
Please keep me honest @stu-gott.

Copy link

@enp0s3 enp0s3 Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@haircommander Hi, I've checked the Jira planning, we are on track, so yes this is indeed accurate.

Copy link

@enp0s3 enp0s3 Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@haircommander The timeline bullet GA higher workload density in OpenShift Virtualization in 2024 relates to the phase 1 only. Maybe we should add it in brackets

Copy link
Author

@iholder101 iholder101 Sep 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @haircommander!
@enp0s3 and I reworked the PR. Can you please have another look?

@enp0s3
Copy link

enp0s3 commented Sep 20, 2024

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 20, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 24, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Stale enhancement proposals rot after 7d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten proposals close after an additional 7d of inactivity.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 31, 2024
@enp0s3
Copy link

enp0s3 commented Nov 7, 2024

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Nov 7, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 6, 2024
@enp0s3
Copy link

enp0s3 commented Dec 6, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

fabiand and others added 8 commits August 29, 2025 17:38
@enp0s3
Copy link

enp0s3 commented Aug 29, 2025

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 29, 2025
@enp0s3
Copy link

enp0s3 commented Aug 29, 2025

It was a busy month, will prioritize this EP for this week.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Sep 27, 2025

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 27, 2025
@enp0s3
Copy link

enp0s3 commented Sep 27, 2025

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 27, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 27, 2025

@iholder101: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Oct 25, 2025

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 25, 2025
@enp0s3
Copy link

enp0s3 commented Oct 26, 2025

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 26, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Nov 23, 2025

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 23, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Stale enhancement proposals rot after 7d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten proposals close after an additional 7d of inactivity.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 1, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Rotten enhancement proposals close after 7d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Reopen the proposal by commenting /reopen.
Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this proposal from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2025

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten enhancement proposals close after 7d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Reopen the proposal by commenting /reopen.
Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this proposal from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mrunalp mrunalp mrunalp left review comments

@jupierce jupierce Awaiting requested review from jupierce

@rvanderp3 rvanderp3 Awaiting requested review from rvanderp3

@Barakmor1 Barakmor1 Awaiting requested review from Barakmor1

@enp0s3 enp0s3 Awaiting requested review from enp0s3

@fabiand fabiand Awaiting requested review from fabiand

@kannon92 kannon92 Awaiting requested review from kannon92

+2 more reviewers

@dankenigsberg dankenigsberg dankenigsberg requested changes

@haircommander haircommander haircommander left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@iholder101 @enp0s3 @openshift-bot @haircommander @fabiand @mrunalp @dankenigsberg