Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Oct 9, 2025

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and HCP does not configure the secret. The combination of these two things means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at scale.

Clean pick from #1242 onto 4.19.

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and
HCP does not configure the secret.  The combination of these two things
means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the
ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at
scale.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 9, 2025
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Oct 9, 2025

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-62867

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62867 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62868. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-62868: temporarily disable metrics auth for hypershift clusters

In response to this:

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-62867

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title temporarily disable metrics auth for hypershift clusters OCPBUGS-62868: temporarily disable metrics auth for hypershift clusters Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62868, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62867 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is New instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and HCP does not configure the secret. The combination of these two things means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at scale.

Clean pick from #1242 onto 4.19.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@DavidHurta DavidHurta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DavidHurta, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@wking: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

sjenning commented Oct 9, 2025

/verified by @sjenning

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sjenning: This PR has been marked as verified by @sjenning.

In response to this:

/verified by @sjenning

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Oct 9, 2025

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 9, 2025
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Oct 9, 2025

/hold Scott wanted to cook #1244 for ~24 before merging this, and with this week's nightlies already selected for 4.19.z, we just have to merge in time to land in next week's nightlies

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 9, 2025
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 13, 2025

/hold cancel

everything looks good.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 13, 2025
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 13, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62868, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62867 to target a version in 4.20.0, but it targets "4.20.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@deads2k deads2k added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 13, 2025
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 13, 2025

/refresh

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Oct 13, 2025

/tide refresh

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f75d9d5 into openshift:release-4.19 Oct 13, 2025
15 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62868 is in an unrecognized state (Verified) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and HCP does not configure the secret. The combination of these two things means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at scale.

Clean pick from #1242 onto 4.19.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@wking wking deleted the disable-metrics-auth-on-hypershift-4.19 branch October 13, 2025 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants