Skip to content

Conversation

@dhellmann
Copy link
Member

We build an image for the baremetal-operator out of the openshift fork
of the repo. We should start using that to test, as a way to force
ourselves to pull fixes from the upstream version of the operator into
the openshift fork.

@russellb russellb added the CI check this PR with CI label Jul 26, 2019
@metal3ci
Copy link

Build FAILURE, see build http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/955/

We build an image for the baremetal-operator out of the openshift fork
of the repo. We should start using that to test, as a way to force
ourselves to pull fixes from the upstream version of the operator into
the openshift fork so we don't forget that step.
@dhellmann dhellmann force-pushed the use-openshift-fork-of-bmo branch from ac8b16a to 818151e Compare July 29, 2019 13:42
@metal3ci
Copy link

Build FAILURE, see build http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/956/

Copy link
Member

@stbenjam stbenjam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable to me, kicked off CI again here: http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/1014/

@metal3ci
Copy link

metal3ci commented Aug 8, 2019

Build FAILURE, see build http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/1014/

@markmc
Copy link
Contributor

markmc commented Aug 20, 2019

Obsolete since #726

Thanks

@markmc markmc closed this Aug 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CI check this PR with CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants