Skip to content

Specification 1.0 simplify #12

@duhengforever

Description

@duhengforever

After a period of public review, many messaging experts gave lots of valuable suggestions, and many of them thought that the specification is not concise, contains some fields that are not related to the messaging field, such as the transactionId field, even though many messaging middleware supports the transaction in different ways.
So in the next, I personally think that we should polish and simplify the specification field-by-field, and welcome everyone to leave a comment in this issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions