-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
HW FRR switchover notification support for protection groups #2269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
chikkaiah-work
wants to merge
2
commits into
opencomputeproject:master
Choose a base branch
from
chikkaiah-work:protection_grp_notification
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+254
−153
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does SAI Knows which is primary across multiple NHGS created in the system. actually existing model already supports this i think. the only missing is H/w protection with callbacks when there is a state change.
Below is my understanding based on current model
NHG-1: Primary group (Endpoint-1)
NHG-2: Backup group (Endpoint-2)
NHG-3: Parent NHG with:
Member-1: Primary → NHG-1
Member-2: Backup → NHG-2
This models protection at the group level, which is particularly useful for hierarchical ECMP (H-ECMP) scenarios, where failover happens across endpoint groups.
Also, this use-case is already supported in the current model.
Example Flow:
Create NHG-1 with Tunnel endpoint-1
Create NHG-2 with Tunnel endpoint-2
Create NHG-3 and add:
NHG-1 as primary
NHG-2 as secondary (backup)
In the current SAI model, this can be represented using smaller protected NHGs and composing them into a parent group:
Create NHG-2 with:
Primary → NH1
Backup → NH2
Create NHG-3 with:
Primary → NH2
Backup → NH1
NH3 and NH4 do not have backups
Create NHG-1 and add members:
Member-1: NHG-2
Member-2: NHG-3
Member-3: NH3
Member-4: NH4
This effectively models per-member protection, where some next-hops have protection while others do not.
For the current model, NHG-level notifications on switchover from primary to backup should be sufficient, in my view for H/w based protection. As the protection semantics are already captured through the existing NHG hierarchy/composition
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sathk-marvell, You are right all these are already exists. I'm just adding notification callback. the way diffs are created is confusing. The new changes are in this file starts from line #162.
Please let me know if I have missed anything form your feedback.