feat: add experimental_bearer_token option to model provider definition #5467
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bolinfest
changed the title
pakrym-oai
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2025
bolinfest
changed the title
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While we do not want to encourage users to hardcode secrets in their
config.tomlfile, it should be possible to pass an API key programmatically. For example, when usingcodex app-server, it is possible to pass a "bag of configuration" as part of theNewConversationParams:codex/codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol.rs
Lines 248 to 251 in 682d055
When using
codex app-server, it's not practical to change env vars of thecodex app-serverprocess on the fly (which is how we usually read API key values), so this helps with that.