-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Added end to end test for mem ballast #80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,14 +1,18 @@ | ||
| # Test Results | ||
| Started: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:31:56 -0400 | ||
| Started: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 05:42:19 +0530 | ||
|
|
||
| Test|Result|Duration|CPU Avg%|CPU Max%|RAM Avg MiB|RAM Max MiB|Sent Spans|Received Spans | ||
| ----|------|-------:|-------:|-------:|----------:|----------:|---------:|-------------: | ||
| TestIdleMode|Passed|10s|0.3|1.0|25|34|0|0 | ||
| Test10kSPS|Passed|17s|91.4|95.7|35|43|149610|149610 | ||
| TestNoBackend10kSPS|Passed|10s|59.1|59.3|29|40|99910|0 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/0*0bytes|Passed|12s|18.7|19.3|30|41|10000|10000 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/100*50bytes|Passed|12s|70.2|71.0|32|45|10000|10000 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/10*1000bytes|Passed|12s|68.0|74.3|32|44|10000|10000 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/20*5000bytes|Passed|12s|158.2|173.7|39|55|10000|10000 | ||
| Test |Result|Duration|CPU Avg%|CPU Max%|RAM Avg MiB|RAM Max MiB|Sent Spans|Received Spans | ||
| ----------------------------------------|------|-------:|-------:|-------:|----------:|----------:|---------:|-------------: | ||
| TestIdleMode |PASS | 10s| 0.3| 1.0| 25| 34| 0| 0 | ||
| Test10kSPS |PASS | 16s| 72.6| 92.0| 34| 41| 144520| 144520 | ||
| TestNoBackend10kSPS |PASS | 10s| 75.6| 78.3| 29| 40| 97460| 0 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/0*0bytes |PASS | 11s| 22.3| 24.0| 31| 42| 10000| 10000 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/100*50bytes |PASS | 11s| 92.3| 106.3| 33| 46| 9990| 9990 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/10*1000bytes |PASS | 11s| 86.2| 93.3| 34| 46| 10000| 10000 | ||
| Test1000SPSWithAttributes/20*5000bytes |PASS | 11s| 126.3| 130.0| 47| 64| 9990| 9990 | ||
| TestBallast1000SPSWithAttributes/0*0bytes|PASS | 11s| 20.4| 21.7| 71| 109| 10000| 10000 | ||
| TestBallast1000SPSWithAttributes/100*50bytes|PASS | 11s| 64.4| 68.0| 492| 845| 9950| 9950 | ||
| TestBallast1000SPSWithAttributes/10*1000bytes|PASS | 11s| 55.1| 59.7| 350| 575| 9990| 9990 | ||
| TestBallast1000SPSWithAttributes/20*5000bytes|PASS | 11s| 67.8| 69.3| 786| 1081| 9950| 9950 | ||
|
|
||
| Total duration: 87s | ||
| Total duration: 127s |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test with ballast specifies the same expectedMaxCPU as the one without ballast. However test results that you posted show that with ballast it actually uses less CPU. So, perhaps tighten a bit expectedMaxCPU in this test? I suggest you leave about 30% of slack in CPU (that was my rule of thumb when writing other perf tests).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I did reduce the numbers before creating the PR. Probably I missed something in the first push. In any case, updated the numbers and reduced them a further.