[xconnector] Add component ID type validation to factory methods

[dmitryax]

Adds component ID type validation to all xconnector Create methods to match the pattern used in the all other factories. The checks were missed in #12381

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.10%. Comparing base (ee8646e) to head (06f9284).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14357      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.09%   92.10%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         668      668              
  Lines       41363    41377      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits        38092    38112      +20     
+ Misses       2231     2227       -4     
+ Partials     1040     1038       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #14357 will degrade performance by 31.53%

_{Comparing dmitryax:add-missing-checks (06f9284) with main (ee8646e)}

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

❌ 4 regressions
✅ 55 untouched
⏩ 20 skipped¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	BenchmarkTraceSizeBytes	299.8 µs	437.8 µs	-31.53%
❌	BenchmarkProfilesToProto	1.2 µs	1.7 µs	-27.01%
❌	BenchmarkLogsToProto2k	44.7 µs	63.2 µs	-29.25%
❌	BenchmarkTracesToProto2k	69.9 µs	96 µs	-27.15%

Footnotes

1. 20 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩