Skip to content

Conversation

@bogdandrutu
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2025 23:21
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu requested a review from atoulme April 15, 2025 23:21
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu force-pushed the reenable-logging-attributes branch 2 times, most recently from 3ca716c to 8b62e10 Compare April 15, 2025 23:29
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.47%. Comparing base (093b1e9) to head (3f0fcf8).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
service/internal/graph/connector.go 50.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
service/internal/graph/exporter.go 50.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
service/internal/graph/processor.go 50.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
service/internal/graph/receiver.go 50.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (85.71%) is below the target coverage (95.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #12869   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.46%   91.47%           
=======================================
  Files         493      494    +1     
  Lines       26984    27012   +28     
=======================================
+ Hits        24682    24710   +28     
+ Misses       1818     1814    -4     
- Partials      484      488    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu force-pushed the reenable-logging-attributes branch from 8b62e10 to 3f0fcf8 Compare April 16, 2025 03:17
@bogdandrutu
Copy link
Member Author

Changing this in favor of #12856

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant