Skip to content

test: replace fs.accessSync with common.fileExists #17446

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Leko wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

test: replace fs.accessSync with common.fileExists #17446

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a534671
test: replace fs.accessSync with common.fileExists
Leko Dec 4, 2017
025cae6
test: replace common.fileExists with fs.existsSync
Leko Dec 6, 2017
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions test/parallel/test-npm-install.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -57,7 +57,5 @@ function handleExit(error, stdout, stderr) {

assert.strictEqual(code, 0, `npm install got error code ${code}`);
assert.strictEqual(signalCode, null, `unexpected signal: ${signalCode}`);
assert.doesNotThrow(function() {
fs.accessSync(`${installDir}/node_modules/package-name`);
});
assert(common.fileExists(`${installDir}/node_modules/package-name`));
Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig Dec 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fs.existsSync() would be a better choice.

Copy link
Contributor

@apapirovski apapirovski Dec 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This raises the question of whether common.fileExists is very aptly named or not... it uses accessSync under the hood rather than existsSync.

Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig Dec 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned this somewhere else recently. fs.existsSync() was marked for deprecation a while back, so common.fileExists() was added to take its place in the tests. After enough user outrage feedback, existsSync() was undeprecated. common.fileExists() is now redundant and should be removed #codeandlearn #goodfirstcontribution.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Leko Leko Dec 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cjihrig @apapirovski Thank you for review.
Should I replace common.fileExists with fs.existsSync ?

Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig Dec 5, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Leko I would change it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Leko Leko Dec 6, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I got it. I'll update it.

}