Skip to content

Conversation

@sug0
Copy link
Collaborator

@sug0 sug0 commented May 8, 2023

Closes #1291

NOTE: The PR is closed, but reviews are still welcome!


TODO: write e2e test that deletes a proof from storage, and uses the new namadac sub-command to generate the missing proof. on-going effort here: https://p.sicp.me/nHvwQ

@sug0 sug0 mentioned this pull request May 8, 2023
@sug0 sug0 requested review from cwgoes and juped May 8, 2023 14:05
@sug0 sug0 marked this pull request as draft May 8, 2023 15:19
@sug0 sug0 requested a review from gijswijs May 8, 2023 15:45
@sug0 sug0 force-pushed the tiago/ethbridge/offline-valset-upd branch from 3fee31a to 05ef908 Compare May 9, 2023 13:00
@sug0 sug0 marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2023 13:01
@sug0 sug0 merged commit 5c0caf0 into tiago/ethbridge/main May 9, 2023
@sug0 sug0 deleted the tiago/ethbridge/offline-valset-upd branch May 9, 2023 13:10
Copy link
Collaborator

@cwgoes cwgoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK, needs a test (as you mention)

@sug0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sug0 commented May 15, 2023

for the record, I accidentally tested this by corrupting storage (not writing a validator set update proof during FinalizeBlock) while running some unrelated test. I saw the chance to test this cmd, and it worked as expected

sug0 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants