Skip to content

Conversation

@njbrake
Copy link
Contributor

@njbrake njbrake commented Oct 29, 2025

Description

(Waiting for an API key to verify behavior)

PR Type

🆕 New Feature ## Relevant issues

Checklist

  • I have added unit tests that prove my fix/feature works
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • Documentation was updated where necessary
  • I have read and followed the contribution guidelines```

- Introduced MinimaxProvider class for integration with the Minimax API.
- Updated pyproject.toml to include Minimax in optional dependencies.
- Added Minimax to the LLMProvider enumeration.
- Updated test configurations to map Minimax to its corresponding model.
@njbrake njbrake linked an issue Oct 29, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@njbrake njbrake marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2025 16:23
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/any_llm/constants.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/any_llm/providers/minimax/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/any_llm/providers/minimax/minimax.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 37 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@njbrake njbrake marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2025 14:18
@njbrake njbrake merged commit 4d661c6 into main Oct 30, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@njbrake njbrake deleted the 584-add-new-provider-minimax branch October 30, 2025 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add new provider minimax

2 participants