Skip to content

Conversation

@peff
Copy link
Contributor

@peff peff commented Mar 24, 2014

Git has odd sorting requirements for tree entries. The entries are sorted by name, but sub-trees sort as if they had "/" at the end. That means when you add full paths to the index like this:

index.add("foo.bar", "content")
index.add("foo/file", "content")
index.write_tree()

the resulting tree ends up sorted correctly (foo must come after foo.bar, because / comes after .). But if you provide individual sha1s, like this:

index.add("foo.bar", "content")
index.add("foo", [some_tree_sha1, "40000"])
index.write_tree()

we end up sorting the entries in the wrong order. Git complains (and may provide incorrect answers for diffs, since we rely on the sort order there).

The fix is fairly straightforward; we already take special care to use a separate sorting key that includes the "/", but we missed the case of a sub-tree being named explicitly by its sha1.

I know Grit is in "deprecated mode", but this is a real bug that can cause corrupt objects to be created. It's probably worth including.

Git has odd sorting requirements for tree entries. The
entries are sorted by name, but sub-trees sort as if they
had "/" at the end. That means when you add full paths to
the index like this:

    index.add("foo.bar", "content")
    index.add("foo/file", "content")
    index.write_tree()

the resulting tree ends up sorted correctly (`foo` must come
after `foo.bar`, because `/` comes after `.`). But if you
provide individual sha1s, like this:

    index.add("foo.bar", "content")
    index.add("foo", [some_tree_sha1, "40000"])
    index.write_tree()

we end up sorting the entries in the wrong order. Git
complains (and may provide incorrect answers for diffs,
since we rely on the sort order there).

The fix is fairly straightforward; we already take special
care to use a separate sorting key that includes the "/",
but we missed the case of a sub-tree being named explicitly
by its sha1.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant