Skip to content

Conversation

@TWiStErRob
Copy link
Contributor

I created a separate PR as this might be contested and iterated, and don't want to block the merging of the fix.

@TWiStErRob
Copy link
Contributor Author

This might be superseded by #502, which a much more robust and realistic way of testing a library.

@TimvdLippe
Copy link
Contributor

Let's do #502 instead indeed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants