For type:
type Example {
email: String
}
If email is deleted, schema keeps definition of Example without any fields, causing schema to fail to validate.
I am not 100% sure if this is an error on AGP's part. What if this type is extended later in the schema and still defines useful directives on itself?
For type:
If
emailis deleted, schema keeps definition ofExamplewithout any fields, causing schema to fail to validate.I am not 100% sure if this is an error on AGP's part. What if this type is extended later in the schema and still defines useful directives on itself?