[CHANGES.md] replace bitwise-OR with logical-OR for expando declarations #2268
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR corrects a documentation typo in the "Fallback initialisers" example, changing the bitwise-OR operator (|) to the logical-OR operator (||), which correctly represents the standard JavaScript fallback initialization pattern.
Key change:
- Fixed the operator in the example from
f.x = f.x | inittof.x = f.x || init
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems like this example:
f.x = f.x | initis not meant to be bitwise. I don't see any discussion in #1426 about this particular change, nor in the baselines that were accepted.Strangely, this example doesn't actually work in Strada, regardless of whether it's a bitwise-OR with logical-OR. Playground link. So perhaps I'm missing something obvious...