Skip to content

Conversation

@you-n-g
Copy link
Collaborator

@you-n-g you-n-g commented Oct 30, 2022

Description

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Pass the test by running: pytest qlib/tests/test_all_pipeline.py under upper directory of qlib.
  • If you are adding a new feature, test on your own test scripts.

Screenshots of Test Results (if appropriate):

  1. Pipeline test:
  2. Your own tests:

Types of changes

  • Fix bugs
  • Add new feature
  • Update documentation

@you-n-g you-n-g requested a review from lihuoran October 30, 2022 10:48
@you-n-g
Copy link
Collaborator Author

you-n-g commented Oct 30, 2022

Hi, @lihuoran Is this enough to remove the fill_missing_data in #1332 ?

@you-n-g you-n-g mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2022
5 tasks
@you-n-g
Copy link
Collaborator Author

you-n-g commented Oct 30, 2022

MARK:
The backtest result of qrun benchmarks/LightGBM/workflow_config_lightgbm_Alpha158.yaml does not change

@you-n-g
Copy link
Collaborator Author

you-n-g commented Oct 30, 2022

@lihuoran The CI fails when it tests the RL part.
It may conflict with #1332 fill_missing_values.
Maybe we should cherry-pick this PR and test it with #1332 together.

@you-n-g
Copy link
Collaborator Author

you-n-g commented Oct 30, 2022

The merge target is changed to microsoft:huoran/fix_rl_todos
The new PR is #1334

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant