Skip to content

Fix LiteLLM dual init issue #32

Fix LiteLLM dual init issue

Fix LiteLLM dual init issue #32

Triggered via pull request October 24, 2025 16:20
@ultmasterultmaster
ready_for_review #206
Status Success
Total duration 19m 50s
Artifacts 2

examples-compat.yml

on: pull_request_target
label-check
4s
label-check
Matrix: backward-compatibility
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 warning and 4 notices
Training no improvement
No improvement (run_name=calc_x_20251024162748 start=0.5000, end=0.5000)
label-check
Triggering this workflow because pull request has the 'ci-all' label.
label-check
Pull request labels: ci-all
label-check
This workflow is triggered by pull_request_target
Training completed
Run has improved (run_name=calc_x_20251024162914 start=0.5000, end=0.5500)

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size Digest
dependencies-backward-compatibility-3.10-legacy
6.82 KB
sha256:197f2baa248547bf9668ded298f4b1e688099489d1a74c06f39330086da0e2fb
dependencies-backward-compatibility-3.12-stable
6.75 KB
sha256:85edb29518f95e64eca60d18f45eb60a189be33e333225a7ba6dd852ce06e927