Skip to content

Conversation

@mfts
Copy link
Owner

@mfts mfts commented May 22, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved reliability of webhook lookups by updating the identifier used for matching webhooks.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
papermark ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 22, 2025 4:46pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The code was updated to change the database query for finding a webhook, switching the lookup key from the id field to the pId field in the prisma.webhook.findUnique method. No other logic or exported/public entities were modified.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
app/api/webhooks/callback/route.ts Modified the webhook lookup to use pId instead of id in the database query.

Poem

A hop, a skip, a lookup switch,
From id to pId, we made the pitch.
The webhooks now know where to go,
With queries hopping to and fro.
In fields we trust, the change is done—
The database chase is now more fun! 🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm warn config production Use --omit=dev instead.
npm error Exit handler never called!
npm error This is an error with npm itself. Please report this error at:
npm error https://github.com/npm/cli/issues
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-05-22T16_44_51_920Z-debug-0.log

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1931712 and faf50cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/api/webhooks/callback/route.ts (1 hunks)


const webhook = await prisma.webhook.findUnique({
where: { id: webhookId },
where: { pId: webhookId },
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Good fix! Using the correct ID field will resolve the webhook detection issue.

The change from id to pId aligns with the PR objective of fixing webhook detection. This ensures webhooks are correctly identified in the database using the proper unique identifier.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify other webhook-related endpoints are also using pId:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find other places in the codebase where webhooks are being looked up
rg "webhook.*findUnique" --type ts -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 927


Standardize webhook lookups to use pId in all endpoints

The events endpoint still queries by id instead of pId. Update the lookup in pages/api/teams/[teamId]/webhooks/[id]/events.ts so it matches the callback handler.

• File: pages/api/teams/[teamId]/webhooks/[id]/events.ts
Change the findUniqueOrThrow where clause:

- const { pId } = await prisma.webhook.findUniqueOrThrow({
-   where: { id: webhookId, teamId },
+ const { pId } = await prisma.webhook.findUniqueOrThrow({
+   where: { pId: webhookId, teamId },

This ensures all webhook endpoints consistently use pId to identify webhooks.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In pages/api/teams/[teamId]/webhooks/[id]/events.ts around the webhook lookup
using findUniqueOrThrow, update the where clause to use pId instead of id for
identifying webhooks. This change aligns with the callback handler and ensures
consistent webhook identification across all endpoints by querying with the
correct unique identifier field pId.

@mfts mfts merged commit 21229d5 into main May 22, 2025
4 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 22, 2025
@mfts mfts deleted the fix/webhooks branch August 19, 2025 07:58
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants