Skip to content

Conversation

@mfts
Copy link
Owner

@mfts mfts commented May 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved security by requiring authentication for access to S3 presigned URLs.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error messages for failed requests, providing clearer feedback to users.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 21, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
papermark ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 21, 2025 0:02am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce authentication for obtaining presigned S3 URLs by requiring a bearer token in API requests, sourced from an environment variable. Both the client and server now handle authorization and provide improved, more specific error messages. Server-side error logging has also been enhanced for better traceability.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
lib/files/get-file.ts Adds Authorization header with bearer token from environment variable to POST request; improves error message parsing.
pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts Enforces bearer token authentication, enhances error handling and logging, adds logging utility import.

Poem

In the warren of code, a secret key hops,
Now only with tokens, the S3 door unlocks.
Errors speak clearer, logs leave a trail,
Security’s stronger—no more easy avail!
With headers and checks, our files are secure,
A rabbit’s proud thump: our code is mature! 🐇🔐

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm warn config production Use --omit=dev instead.
npm error Exit handler never called!
npm error This is an error with npm itself. Please report this error at:
npm error https://github.com/npm/cli/issues
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-05-21T12_00_05_016Z-debug-0.log

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 30th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb55bc2 and d535b20.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
lib/files/get-file.ts (1)

44-45: Improved error handling with specific error messages.

The error handling has been enhanced to extract and propagate the specific error message from the server response, which provides better context for debugging and user feedback.

Consider adding a fallback for cases where the response might not be in JSON format or doesn't have a message property:

-    const error = await response.json();
-    throw new Error(error.message);
+    try {
+      const error = await response.json();
+      throw new Error(error.message || `Failed to get file from S3: ${response.status}`);
+    } catch (e) {
+      // Handle case where response is not JSON
+      throw new Error(`Failed to get file from S3: ${response.status}`);
+    }
pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (2)

21-29: Added authorization check for API endpoint security.

Authentication has been implemented to secure the API endpoint, which is a good security practice. The code checks for a bearer token in the Authorization header and validates it against an environment variable.

Consider handling the case where the Authorization header might be missing or malformed:

  // Extract the API Key from the Authorization header
  const authHeader = req.headers.authorization;
- const token = authHeader?.split(" ")[1]; // Assuming the format is "Bearer [token]"
+ const token = authHeader && authHeader.startsWith('Bearer ') ? authHeader.split(" ")[1] : null;

  // Check if the API Key matches
- if (token !== process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
+ if (!token || token !== process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
    res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized" });
    return;
  }

61-67: Enhanced error logging and response.

The error handling has been improved to log detailed information about errors and provide a more specific error message in the response. This will aid in debugging and provide better feedback.

Consider sanitizing sensitive information in error logs and adding more structure to the error response:

  log({
-   message: `Error getting presigned get url for ${key} \n\n ${error}`,
+   message: `Error getting presigned get url for ${key.substring(0, 20)}... \n\n ${error.toString().substring(0, 200)}...`,
    type: "error",
  });
  return res
    .status(500)
-   .json({ error: "AWS Cloudfront Signed URL Error", message: error });
+   .json({ 
+     error: "AWS Cloudfront Signed URL Error", 
+     message: error.toString(),
+     requestId: req.headers['x-request-id'] || Date.now().toString()  // For traceability
+   });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a1b5d2 and 64de131.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • lib/files/get-file.ts (1 hunks)
  • pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (1)
lib/utils.ts (1)
  • log (52-112)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (1)

9-9: Added logging utility import.

The import for the log utility has been added to support enhanced error logging.

method: "POST",
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY}`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Authentication added for presigned URL requests.

A bearer token authentication has been added to secure the S3 presigned URL endpoint. This is a good security practice.

Consider adding a check to handle cases where the environment variable might not be set:

-        Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY}`,
+        Authorization: process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY ? `Bearer ${process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY}` : '',

Also, verify that this environment variable is properly documented and set in all deployment environments:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Checking if INTERNAL_API_KEY is defined in environment files..."
grep -r "INTERNAL_API_KEY" .env* --include=".env*" || echo "INTERNAL_API_KEY not found in any .env files"

Length of output: 293


Ensure INTERNAL_API_KEY is guarded and documented

The INTERNAL_API_KEY lookup currently assumes the variable is set. Our check shows it’s not defined in any .env* files, so we need to:

• In lib/files/get-file.ts, guard against a missing key (e.g. throw an error or use an empty string/fallback).
• In your environment files (e.g. .env.example), add INTERNAL_API_KEY with a placeholder and update any deployment docs.

Suggested code change:

-        Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY}`,
+        Authorization: (() => {
+          const key = process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY;
+          if (!key) {
+            throw new Error('Missing INTERNAL_API_KEY environment variable');
+          }
+          return `Bearer ${key}`;
+        })(),

And in .env.example (or your docs):

# API key for internal S3 presigned URL endpoint
INTERNAL_API_KEY=your-internal-api-key-here
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lib/files/get-file.ts at line 37, the code uses process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY
without checking if it is set, which can cause runtime errors or insecure
behavior. Add a guard to verify that INTERNAL_API_KEY is defined before using
it; if it is missing, throw a clear error to prevent proceeding without
authentication. Additionally, update the .env.example file to include
INTERNAL_API_KEY with a placeholder value and ensure deployment documentation
mentions this variable so it is properly set in all environments.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (1)

13-41: Consider implementing rate limiting for this endpoint.

This endpoint now has authentication, which is great. For additional security, consider implementing rate limiting to prevent potential abuse or brute force attempts against the API key.

You could utilize a package like express-rate-limit or implement a simple in-memory rate limiting solution based on the requester's IP address.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64de131 and bb55bc2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • lib/files/get-file.ts (1 hunks)
  • pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lib/files/get-file.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (1)
lib/utils.ts (1)
  • log (52-112)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts (2)

9-9: LGTM! Good addition of logging capability.

The addition of the logging utility import is appropriate for improving error visibility in the API handler.


32-36: Good proactive logging for configuration issues.

The logging of missing environment variables is valuable for diagnosing deployment issues. This helps provide visibility when the service is not configured correctly.

Comment on lines +73 to +79
log({
message: `Error getting presigned get url for ${key} \n\n ${error}`,
type: "error",
});
return res
.status(500)
.json({ error: "AWS Cloudfront Signed URL Error", message: error });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improved error handling and logging, but consider response format.

Adding error logging with context about the requested key is excellent for debugging. However, directly passing the error object in the response might expose sensitive information or fail to serialize properly.

  log({
    message: `Error getting presigned get url for ${key} \n\n ${error}`,
    type: "error",
  });
  return res
    .status(500)
-   .json({ error: "AWS Cloudfront Signed URL Error", message: error });
+   .json({ 
+     error: "AWS Cloudfront Signed URL Error", 
+     message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error) 
+   });

This ensures that only the error message (not the full error object with potentially sensitive stack traces) is returned to the client.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
log({
message: `Error getting presigned get url for ${key} \n\n ${error}`,
type: "error",
});
return res
.status(500)
.json({ error: "AWS Cloudfront Signed URL Error", message: error });
log({
message: `Error getting presigned get url for ${key} \n\n ${error}`,
type: "error",
});
return res
.status(500)
.json({
error: "AWS Cloudfront Signed URL Error",
message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)
});
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts around lines 73 to 79, the error
response currently includes the full error object, which may expose sensitive
information or cause serialization issues. Modify the response to only include
the error message string instead of the entire error object by accessing
error.message or converting the error to a safe string. This ensures the client
receives a clear error message without sensitive details.

Comment on lines 21 to 41
// Extract the API Key from the Authorization header
const authHeader = req.headers.authorization;
if (!authHeader || !authHeader.startsWith("Bearer ")) {
return res
.status(401)
.json({ message: "Unauthorized: Invalid Authorization header" });
}
const token = authHeader?.split(" ")[1]; // Assuming the format is "Bearer [token]"

// Check if the API Key matches
if (!process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
log({
message: "INTERNAL_API_KEY environment variable is not set",
type: "error",
});
return res.status(500).json({ message: "Server configuration error" });
}
if (token !== process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized" });
return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement proper authentication for presigned URL requests.

The added authentication logic properly secures the endpoint by validating the bearer token against the INTERNAL_API_KEY environment variable, which is a good security practice.

However, there are a few minor issues to address:

  1. Line 28 uses optional chaining (?.) on authHeader even though its existence is already verified on line 23
  2. No validation for empty token after Bearer prefix
  3. Inconsistent response format between different error scenarios

Consider this revised implementation:

  // Extract the API Key from the Authorization header
  const authHeader = req.headers.authorization;
  if (!authHeader || !authHeader.startsWith("Bearer ")) {
    return res
      .status(401)
      .json({ message: "Unauthorized: Invalid Authorization header" });
  }
- const token = authHeader?.split(" ")[1]; // Assuming the format is "Bearer [token]"
+ const token = authHeader.split(" ")[1]; // Assuming the format is "Bearer [token]"
+ 
+ if (!token) {
+   return res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized: Missing token" });
+ }

  // Check if the API Key matches
  if (!process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
    log({
      message: "INTERNAL_API_KEY environment variable is not set",
      type: "error",
    });
    return res.status(500).json({ message: "Server configuration error" });
  }
  if (token !== process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
-   res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized" });
-   return;
+   return res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized: Invalid token" });
  }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// Extract the API Key from the Authorization header
const authHeader = req.headers.authorization;
if (!authHeader || !authHeader.startsWith("Bearer ")) {
return res
.status(401)
.json({ message: "Unauthorized: Invalid Authorization header" });
}
const token = authHeader?.split(" ")[1]; // Assuming the format is "Bearer [token]"
// Check if the API Key matches
if (!process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
log({
message: "INTERNAL_API_KEY environment variable is not set",
type: "error",
});
return res.status(500).json({ message: "Server configuration error" });
}
if (token !== process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized" });
return;
}
// Extract the API Key from the Authorization header
const authHeader = req.headers.authorization;
if (!authHeader || !authHeader.startsWith("Bearer ")) {
return res
.status(401)
.json({ message: "Unauthorized: Invalid Authorization header" });
}
const token = authHeader.split(" ")[1]; // Assuming the format is "Bearer [token]"
if (!token) {
return res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized: Missing token" });
}
// Check if the API Key matches
if (!process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
log({
message: "INTERNAL_API_KEY environment variable is not set",
type: "error",
});
return res.status(500).json({ message: "Server configuration error" });
}
if (token !== process.env.INTERNAL_API_KEY) {
return res.status(401).json({ message: "Unauthorized: Invalid token" });
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In pages/api/file/s3/get-presigned-get-url.ts around lines 21 to 41, remove the
unnecessary optional chaining on authHeader when extracting the token since its
presence is already checked. Add a validation step to ensure the token extracted
after "Bearer " is not empty or missing. Standardize the error response format
across all authentication failure cases to maintain consistency, returning JSON
with a message field for all errors.

@mfts mfts merged commit 9a8b4bf into main May 21, 2025
4 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 21, 2025
@mfts mfts deleted the feat/diff-url branch August 19, 2025 07:58
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants