Update to Tapenade 3.16

[eirikurj]

Purpose

This PR updates the AD'd files to the latest Tapenade version along with the latest ADFirstAidKit files.

Few things to note, regarding this version of Tapenade. This version creates nonstandard type declarations, so postprocessing steps are added in autoEdit scripts. Additionally, Tapenade seems for some reason to miss the etot_d function in inviscidupwindflux_d (same for reverse) so its added back.

Please review carefully and preferably run and test this on actual cases (aside from the unit/regression tests) to make sure derivatives have not regressed in some edge cases.

Expected time until merged

No rush

Type of change

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (non-backwards-compatible fix or feature)
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)
• Documentation update
• Maintenance update
• Other (please describe)

Testing

Checklist

• I have run flake8 and black to make sure the Python code adheres to PEP-8 and is consistently formatted
• I have formatted the Fortran code with fprettify or C/C++ code with clang-format as applicable
• I have run unit and regression tests which pass locally with my changes
• I have added new tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #312 (8bf7aab) into main (686d096) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #312   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.98%   41.98%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        4001     4001           
=======================================
  Hits         1680     1680           
  Misses       2321     2321           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[lamkina]

I tested the updated build process and ran derivative checks with simple test cases and a MACH-only version of my aeroprop case. Derivatives look good and the tapenade build worked as expected.

[marcomangano]

I also tested this on my side and everything looks good