-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 433
MSC4144: Per-message profiles #4144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
f261e90
9758def
1c0f03e
9b7d7be
99e6bea
8b6b12a
c6abf19
c00010d
b083843
26846d2
2361a1c
734225a
9ca421e
cff64fb
b24060e
a399fda
d4161fd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ | ||
| # MSC4144: Per-message profiles | ||
| Currently profiles in Matrix are defined by `m.room.member` state events, and | ||
| there is no easy way to have different profiles per message. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Proposal | ||
| The proposed solution is a new field called `m.per_message_profile`, which | ||
| contains a displayname and/or avatar URL to override the default profile, | ||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| plus an ID to identify different profiles within the same Matrix user. | ||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "msgtype": "m.text", | ||
| "body": "Hello, World!", | ||
| "m.per_message_profile": { | ||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| "id": "meow", | ||
| "displayname": "cat", | ||
| "avatar_url": "mxc://maunium.net/hgXsKqlmRfpKvCZdUoWDkFQo" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| The `id` field is required and is an opaque string. Clients may use it to group | ||
| messages with the same ID like they would group messages from the same sender. | ||
| For example, bridges would likely set it to the immutable remote user ID. | ||
clokep marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
||
| This ID is scoped to the real MXID used to send the event, but is otherwise | ||
| global. In other words, the same ID in different rooms from the same account | ||
| can be considered to be the same user, but the same ID in the same room from | ||
| different accounts are considered to be different users. | ||
|
|
||
| The field is allowed for all message events, which currently means | ||
| `m.room.message` and `m.sticker`. A future MSC may expand the field to other | ||
| events, such as reactions. | ||
|
|
||
| Modifying per-message profiles using edits is allowed, i.e. clients SHOULD | ||
| include the per-message profile object in `m.new_content` when sending edits | ||
| and read it when receiving edits. Including the per-message profile object in | ||
| the edit fallback at the top level is not necessary, as all clients that support | ||
| per-message profiles can be assumed to support edits. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Field limits | ||
| After JSON decoding, `id` and `displayname` MUST be at most 255 bytes of UTF-8 | ||
| and every code point MUST be a Unicode scalar. Null bytes (`\u0000`) are not | ||
| allowed. | ||
|
|
||
| Like with other images and avatars, clients should ignore any avatar URL that | ||
| is not a `mxc://` URI. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Encrypted avatars | ||
| Because the profile is inside the ciphertext in encrypted events, the entire | ||
| profile can be hidden from the server, as long as the avatar is also encrypted. | ||
| Encrypted avatars are placed under `avatar_file` instead of `avatar_url`. | ||
| The `avatar_file` field has the same schema as the `file` field in | ||
| `m.room.message` events. | ||
|
|
||
| <details> | ||
| <summary>Encrypted avatar example</summary> | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "msgtype": "m.text", | ||
| "body": "Hello, World!", | ||
| "m.per_message_profile": { | ||
| "id": "meow", | ||
| "displayname": "cat", | ||
| "avatar_file": { | ||
| "v": "v2", | ||
| "key": { | ||
| "alg": "A256CTR", | ||
| "ext": true, | ||
| "k": "8dXeBMBMthuXGY5zmUh9Mi0aqC1kndMZ4NCa-0RhELc", | ||
| "key_ops": [ | ||
| "encrypt", | ||
| "decrypt" | ||
| ], | ||
| "kty": "oct" | ||
| }, | ||
| "iv": "L6zup2cR570AAAAAAAAAAA", | ||
| "hashes": { | ||
| "sha256": "/cTs+PajUcznbV3h1w5gh1AHnLjrKQVl2jU3xLCqoBI" | ||
| }, | ||
| "url": "mxc://maunium.net/eKLhozQduElYSgBkWjtwSXoi" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| </details> | ||
|
|
||
| ### Behavior of omitted and empty fields | ||
| If the `displayname` field is omitted, null, or an empty string, the | ||
| displayname from the member event should be used instead. Setting an empty | ||
| displayname using a per-message profile is not supported, as there aren't any | ||
| clear use cases for it. | ||
|
|
||
| However, there are use cases for setting an empty avatar, so `avatar_url` being | ||
| an empty string should be treated as clearing the avatar and falling back to | ||
| the client's default blank avatar behavior (e.g. generating one based on the | ||
| displayname). If both `avatar_url` and `avatar_file` are omitted or null, the | ||
| avatar from the member event should be used instead. If the member event does | ||
| not have an avatar defined either, and the client uses the displayname to | ||
| generate fallback avatars, it should use the per-message displayname for the | ||
| fallback avatar rather than the global one. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Extensible profiles | ||
| This MSC is not related to extensible profiles and does not attempt to | ||
| implement them. However, in case extensible profiles are implemented as | ||
| something that can be referenced (e.g. room IDs), the MSC adding them could | ||
| allow per-message profiles to specify which extensible profile is used. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Fallbacks for old clients | ||
| In order for users on old clients to see the per-message profile data, sending | ||
| clients SHOULD include a fallback containing the per-message displayname. | ||
| When a fallback is used, the per-message profile object MUST include | ||
| `"has_fallback": true`. | ||
|
|
||
| Fallbacks are intentionally optional. Clients MUST NOT assume the message has | ||
| a fallback unless `has_fallback` is set to `true`, | ||
|
|
||
| #### Plaintext fallback | ||
| The fallback MUST be at the beginning of the plaintext `body` and consist of | ||
| the exact value of the `displayname` property, followed by a colon (`:`) and | ||
| a space (`\x20`), e.g. `cat: original message`. | ||
|
|
||
| To remove the plaintext fallback, trim the prefix `{displayname}: ` from the body. | ||
|
|
||
| #### HTML fallback | ||
| If a `formatted_body` of type `org.matrix.custom.html` is present, it SHOULD | ||
| include the same fallback text inside a `strong` tag with the `data-mx-profile-fallback` | ||
| attribute, e.g. `<strong data-mx-profile-fallback>cat: </strong>original message`. | ||
|
|
||
| The displayname MUST be HTML-escaped and there MUST NOT be any HTML tags inside | ||
| the fallback. The tag MUST NOT have any other attributes. The attribute MAY | ||
| have an empty string as its value (`=""`) for compatibility with all HTML | ||
| generators, but MUST NOT have any other value. The HTML fallback is not mandated | ||
| to be at the beginning of the string, as there may be valid reasons to put it | ||
| inside another tag, such as a `<p>` tag. | ||
|
|
||
| To remove the HTML fallback, either use a HTML parser to drop the entire `strong` | ||
| tag with a `data-mx-profile-fallback` attribute, or replace matches of the | ||
| following regex with an empty string: `<strong\s+data-mx-profile-fallback(?:="")?\s*>([^<]+): </strong\s*>` | ||
|
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Stealthii said outside of a thread:
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Duplicating the entire content is a really bad idea. Each fallback doubles the content, so if there are 3 different fallbacks (edits, formatting, per-message profiles), that'd result in 2*2*2 = 8 duplicates of the content. It might be "only" 6 duplicates if the non-fallback per-message profile is only inside
The regex is intentionally fairly strict, other tags are not meant to be allowed. It could maybe slightly be relaxed in terms of the trailing space inside the fallback to allow Alternatively, I guess the fallback itself could be put in another field, such that clients can simply do
The only consequence of deviating from the spec is that the message will render incorrectly. If clients don't implement the spec correctly and their messages render differently than they intended, that's their problem, not the spec's. |
||
|
|
||
| #### Other details | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. My understanding is that, with the current spec text, (if it is not intended, then there is a gap in this design for changing the profile information associated with existing messages)
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Probably makes sense to allow edits as there's no particular reason to disallow them, have specified that explicitly in a399fda |
||
| If a fallback is used in a media message, the `filename` property MUST be set | ||
| to ensure the `body` is treated as a caption rather than a file name. | ||
|
|
||
| Fallbacks MUST only be used when the `displayname` property is a non-empty | ||
| string, i.e. they are not used when falling back to the member event name. | ||
|
|
||
| #### Example with fallback | ||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "msgtype": "m.text", | ||
| "body": "cat: Hello, World!", | ||
| "format": "org.matrix.custom.html", | ||
| "formatted_body": "<p><strong data-mx-profile-fallback>cat: </strong>Hello, World!</p>", | ||
| "m.per_message_profile": { | ||
| "id": "meow", | ||
| "displayname": "cat", | ||
| "avatar_url": "mxc://maunium.net/hgXsKqlmRfpKvCZdUoWDkFQo", | ||
| "has_fallback": true | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Use cases | ||
|
|
||
| ### Bridging | ||
| Per-message profiles will allow making "lighter-weight" bridges that don't need | ||
| appservice access. Currently the only option for such bridges is to prepend the | ||
| displayname to the message, which is extremely ugly. Even though they're ugly, | ||
| there are still rooms that use bot-based bridges like matterbridge, which shows | ||
| there's demand for bridging without requiring server admin access. | ||
|
|
||
| Such bridges would obviously have downsides, like not being able to start chats | ||
| via standard mechanisms, and not being able to see the member list on Matrix. | ||
| However, those may be acceptable compromises for non-puppeting bridges that | ||
| only operate in specific predetermined rooms. Non-message events like reactions | ||
| are also not supported by this MSC, but they could be allowed in the future. | ||
|
|
||
| This method also allows encrypting profile info, which reduces metadata leaked | ||
| by bridging. | ||
|
|
||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| ### Feature-parity with other platforms | ||
| Other chat applications such as Slack and Discord have "webhooks" which allow | ||
| per-message profile overrides. This MSC effectively enables the same on Matrix. | ||
clokep marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
||
| For example, Discord's [execute webhook](https://discord.com/developers/docs/resources/webhook#execute-webhook) | ||
| API takes `username` and `avatar_url` as optional parameters. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Roleplaying, plural users, etc | ||
| Some users want to be able to switch between profiles quickly, which would be | ||
| much easier using this MSC. Currently easiest way is to have multiple accounts, | ||
| which has other benefits, but is much more cumbersome to manage. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Potential issues | ||
| Implementing encrypted avatars could cause difficulty for clients that assume | ||
| that avatars are always unencrypted mxc URIs. | ||
|
|
||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| When per-message profiles are used for bridging, there's no way to mention | ||
| specific users, as mentions will just target the single bridge bot. A future | ||
| MSC could define a way to specify which profile to mention. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Alternatives | ||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| ### New state events | ||
| Per-message profiles could be transmitted more compactly by defining the profile | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This design has a second, more significant advantage, beyond just efficiency. It allows retroactively updating the profile information in old messages sent with a given profile id in a straightforward way. With the proposed design where profile fields are embedded in the messages, changing profile information in old messages requires sending an update to every message, generating a significant number of
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've expanded the description of that alternative in d4161fd (this MSC won't be pursuing that option as the benefits of just having it in the message still outweigh the negatives) |
||
| in a new state event and only referencing the state key in the message event. | ||
| However, that approach wouldn't enable encrypting per-message profiles without | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Per-room profile data (in
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. As covered in the use cases section, bridges and other things that want to protect profile metadata can opt to use only per-message profiles and not store any of that in room state. |
||
| inventing encrypted state events. Additionally, even with encrypted state | ||
| events, some kind of sender identifiers would be leaked via state keys. | ||
|
|
||
| State events also have the downside that they have to be sent into the room | ||
| separately, which means extra work for everyone. They would also pollute the | ||
| room state if a profile is only used once or a few times. | ||
|
|
||
| The main benefit of state events is that it makes it easy to retroactively | ||
| modify the per-message profile of already sent messages. This MSC considers | ||
| retroactive modifications to be sufficiently low-priority that state events | ||
| are not worth it considering the other downsides. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Appservices | ||
| Appservices work perfectly fine for bridging already now, but they require | ||
| admin access to a server, which is not available for everyone. Additionally, | ||
| they have similar metadata issues as the "New state events" alternative above. | ||
|
|
||
| For use cases involving a single human user, having multiple mxids (regardless | ||
| of whether they're registered manually or via an appservice) complicates things | ||
| unnecessarily. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Security considerations | ||
|
|
||
| ### Preventing impersonation | ||
| To prevent impersonation using per-message profiles, clients MUST somehow | ||
| indicate to the user that the message has a per-message profile with an easy | ||
| way to see the user's MXID or default profile. For example, a client could have | ||
| a small `via @user:example.com` text next to the per-message displayname. | ||
|
|
||
tulir marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| To improve user experience, clients MAY omit the indicator when the sender | ||
| account has sufficiently high power level, and the displayname is unique among | ||
| members of the room (i.e. it does not require disambiguation in the | ||
| ["Calculating the display name for a user" spec](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.12/client-server-api/#calculating-the-display-name-for-a-user)). | ||
|
|
||
| The recommended power level to check is the level for a `m.per_message_profile` | ||
| state event (i.e. check `events` -> `m.per_message_profile` and fall back to | ||
| `state_default` if not set). | ||
|
|
||
| ## Unstable prefix | ||
| `com.beeper.per_message_profile` should be used instead of `m.per_message_profile` | ||
| until this MSC is accepted. | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.