Conversation
| free again? 'online'? | ||
|
|
||
| ## Publishing presence | ||
| Homeservers take the effective presence and publish it as an `m.presence` state |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This sounds like turning presences into PDUs? Something like this has been suggested before and has not left many happy, soru still does not think this is the right approach for presences
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hah, yes - good point. Maybe they could be ephemeral events tied to the user profile room?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
EDUs can't be peaked, though. Not sure how to tackle this / if this should be tackled at all. Like, an effective presence does make sense, but does its transport method have to be changed? Not sure.
| @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ | |||
| MSC3032: Thoughts on updating presence | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One issue AS's face with presences is that when setting presences for ghosts they can't set any timeout. What these thoughts are lacking, in sorus opinion, is adding a timeout query parameter to the setting presence endpoint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I hadn't even considered ASes - in fact, ASes probably ought to just be another client and use the same endpoint, except of course that endpoint is /sync... maybe ASes should get their own presence endpoint?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No need for a new endpoint if you can just re-use the /status one with a timeout parameter that can be up to e.g. 24h, that would actually fix all the AS issues
|
|
||
| ## `PUT /_matrix/client/r0/presence/{userId}/status` | ||
| `status_msg` becomes deprecated. In it's place there's a new state event in the | ||
| user's MSC1769 profile room, `m.status`. It's not a field in the `m.profile` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
publishing statuses as state events means that all servers have a cleartext history of all presences stored permanently. This might not be desirable from a privacy point of view.
Soru really gets the benefits of making this a state event, so she isn't sure how to fix this problem.
|
IMHO the status message should be decoupled from the user's presence state. E.g. if I set an "I'm away from x till y" status message, it should be valid regardless of my presence state and if I a have any active sessions or not. Why not take it one step further and abstract it to any kind of data, storable at the account level? There is already a |
Rendered