-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Home
Run 12+ AI agents concurrently. One identity. Full governance. Measurable ROI.
graph TD
subgraph Intent["THE GREAT GOD OM"]
O["Human Intent<br/>& Oversight"]
end
subgraph Agents["CLAUDE AGENTS (12+)"]
A["Feature | Bug Fix<br/>Docs | Review"]
end
subgraph Verify["GEMINI VERIFICATION"]
G["LLD Review | Code Review<br/>Security | Quality"]
end
subgraph Gov["GOVERNANCE GATES"]
M["Requirements | Implementation<br/>Reports | Audit Trail"]
end
subgraph Future["LANGGRAPH EVOLUTION"]
R["State Machines<br/>Checkpoints | Supervisors"]
end
O --> A
A --> G
G --> Gov
Gov --> R
R -.->|"Feedback Loop"| A
AgentOS isn't theoretical. It's been battle-tested through 207 issues (159 closed, 48 open) in 27 days:
Issues closed per day (Central Time):
2026-01-11: 2 ##
2026-01-17: 8 ########
2026-01-21: 12 ############
2026-02-01: 7 #######
2026-02-02: 23 #######################
2026-02-03: 55 #######################################################
2026-02-04: 31 ###############################
| Theme | Examples |
|---|---|
| Workflow Automation | LLD workflow, implementation workflow, TDD workflow |
| Governance & Gates | Gemini verification, mechanical validation, skipped test gates |
| Bug Fixes | Unicode encoding, import errors, stale state bugs |
| Intelligence Layer | Scout workflow, verdict analyzer, template learning |
| Infrastructure | GitHub Actions, Poetry dependencies, cross-platform |
Current velocity: 9.4 issues/day average (55 issues on peak day)
AI coding assistants like Claude Code and GitHub Copilot are transforming software development. But enterprise adoption stalls because:
| Challenge | Reality |
|---|---|
| No coordination | Multiple agents conflict and duplicate work |
| No governance | Security teams can't approve ungoverned AI |
| No verification | AI-generated code goes unreviewed |
| No metrics | Leadership can't prove ROI |
| Permission friction | Constant approval prompts destroy flow state |
Organizations run pilots. Developers love the tools. Then adoption plateaus at 10-20% because the infrastructure layer is missing.
AgentOS provides that infrastructure layer:
| Capability | What It Does | Enterprise Value |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Agent Orchestration | 12+ concurrent agents, one identity | Scale without chaos |
| Gemini Verification | AI reviews AI before humans approve | Quality gates that work |
| Governance Gates | Enforced checkpoints (design, code, docs) | Security team approval |
| Permission Management | Eliminate friction, track patterns | Developer productivity |
| 34 Audits | Security, privacy, AI safety, compliance | Compliance readiness |
| Metrics & KPIs | Adoption, friction, cost, productivity | Prove ROI to leadership |
- Why AgentOS? - Business case, ROI, adoption strategy
- Measuring Productivity - KPIs, dashboards, metrics that matter
- Security & Compliance - What security teams need to approve
- Multi-Agent Orchestration - The headline feature
- Gemini Verification - Claude + Gemini architecture
- LangGraph Evolution - The roadmap (state machines, checkpointing)
- How the AgentOS Learns - Self-improving governance feedback loop
- Quick Start - 5-minute setup
- Permission Friction - The #1 adoption blocker solved
- Why Windows? - Cross-platform design decisions
- Governance Gates - LLD, implementation, report gates
- Security Compliance - OWASP, GDPR, AI Safety audits
AgentOS implements two primary governed workflows:
graph TD
I["Issue Created"]
L["Write LLD"]
G{"Gemini<br/>Review"}
R["Revise"]
A["APPROVED"]
C["Ready for<br/>Implementation"]
I --> L
L --> G
G -->|"BLOCK"| R
R --> G
G -->|"APPROVE"| A
A --> C
Design documents are reviewed by Gemini before any code is written. Learn more
graph TD
S["Start Coding"]
W["Create Worktree"]
I["Implement"]
T["Run Tests"]
R["Generate Reports"]
G{"Gemini<br/>Review"}
P["Create PR"]
M["Merge & Cleanup"]
S --> W
W --> I
I --> T
T --> R
R --> G
G -->|"BLOCK"| I
G -->|"APPROVE"| P
P --> M
Code is reviewed by Gemini before PR creation. Learn more
AgentOS is production-ready today with prompt-based orchestration. The roadmap transforms it into an enterprise-grade state machine platform:
| Timeline | Milestone | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | LangGraph state machines, checkpointing | Gates enforced, not suggested |
| Q2 2026 | Supervisor pattern, LangSmith observability | Autonomous task decomposition |
| Q3 2026 | Dynamic tool graphs, multi-tenant support | Scale to organizations |
See: LangGraph Evolution for the full technical vision.
Claude builds code. Gemini reviews it. This isn't just "two models" - it's adversarial verification where one AI checks another's work before humans approve. Learn more
We obsess over permission friction because it's the #1 adoption killer. Our friction logging protocol (Zugzwang) identifies patterns, and our tools auto-remediate them. Learn more
The system learns from Gemini verdicts to improve templates automatically. 164 verdicts analyzed, 6 template sections added. Learn more
Every workflow has a Discworld character defining its philosophy. This isn't whimsy - it's intuitive system design. Vimes guards (regression tests), Lu-Tze sweeps (janitor), Brutha remembers (RAG).
| Persona | Function | Philosophy |
|---|---|---|
| The Great God Om | Human Orchestrator | Pure Intent |
| Moist von Lipwig | Pipeline Orchestration | Keep messages moving |
| Lord Vetinari | Work Visibility | Information is power |
| Commander Vimes | Regression Tests | Deep suspicion |
| Captain Angua | External Intelligence | Sensory awareness |
| Brutha | RAG Memory | Perfect recall |
| Lu-Tze | Maintenance | Constant sweeping |
- Read the architecture: Multi-Agent Orchestration
- Understand the roadmap: LangGraph Evolution
- See the metrics: Measuring Productivity
- Try it: Quick Start
"A man is not dead while his name is still spoken." GNU Terry Pratchett