Conversation
raboof
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good to align.
I think I prefer having the sbt project id the same as the artifact name, so I'd maybe rather change things the 'other way around' - but this is OK
Personally I agree, but I thought I'd just follow the style that existed |
|
+1 on following artifact names (but I think it might interfere with how @RayRoestenburg s dev env is set up?) |
|
I can do something temporarily, or fix sbt-sublime, which is so old, I should probably rip off the band-aid :-) so do what is best. |
* similar to codegenJava * annoying that they have different naming conventions
4195f91 to
ce782fa
Compare
|
Could we merge this as a first sanity and do a bigger build refactoring later if we feel that is important? |
|
(ah I didn't realize the package names were interfering with sbt-sublime) |
|
They don't, it is actually the name of the project variables, (It does not support identifiers in backticks) so this is not an issue. |
* similar to codegenJava * annoying that they have different naming conventions
tab completion: