[DO NOT MERGE] Test rust-libp2p rust-yamux v0.12 upgrade

[mxinden]

Benchmark performance impact of rust-yamux v0.12 upgrade on rust-libp2p, more specifically libp2p/rust-libp2p#3013.

[mxinden]

@thomaseizinger once https://github.com/libp2p/test-plans/actions/runs/5727165977/job/15519015306 finished you can see the results on the dashboard below. Make sure to scroll to the bottom to find a graph comparing rust-libp2p/v0.52 with rust-libp2p/yamux-v0.12.

https://observablehq.com/@libp2p-workspace/performance-dashboard?branch=perf-rust-libp2p-yamux-v0.12

[thomaseizinger]

@mxinden No space left on device :(

[mxinden]

Thanks for the ping. Retriggered https://github.com/libp2p/test-plans/actions/runs/5727165977/job/15527780097. First time I see this issue. Do concurrent runs compete with disc-space on GitHub runners?

[thomaseizinger]

Do concurrent runs compete with disc-space on GitHub runners?

Not that I am aware.

[thomaseizinger]

Thanks for the ping. Retriggered https://github.com/libp2p/test-plans/actions/runs/5727165977/job/15527780097. First time I see this issue. Do concurrent runs compete with disc-space on GitHub runners?

Failed again :(

[thomaseizinger]

I retriggered it with a reduced set of implementations, lets see if that helps: https://github.com/libp2p/test-plans/actions/runs/5738590877

[thomaseizinger]

I retriggered it with a reduced set of implementations, lets see if that helps: libp2p/test-plans/actions/runs/5738590877

Failed again, I didn't realize that excluding them from the versions.ts file doesn't actually skip the build. cc @mxinden A feature-request? :)

[mxinden]

@thomaseizinger results are now updated on https://observablehq.com/@libp2p-workspace/performance-dashboard?branch=perf-rust-libp2p-yamux-v0.12.

Upload shows a slight improvement. Download does not. Without further digging I would expect this to be noise only. No regressions. Ready to go.

[mxinden]

Closing here. Great to see this in action.