feat(gossipsub): remove KeepAlive::Until#4642
Conversation
|
Cool! Let us know once this is ready for review. Generally in favor of removing the idle timeout from |
KeepAlive::Until usage from libp2p-gossipsubKeepAlive::Until usage from gossipsub
|
@mxinden I would be deeply grateful for your feedback |
thomaseizinger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for sending the patch! One small point, otherwise LGTM!
KeepAlive::Until usage from gossipsubKeepAlive::Until usage from gossipsub
KeepAlive::Until usage from gossipsubKeepAlive::Until usage
KeepAlive::Until usageKeepAlive::Until
|
If this PR is okay, I'll move on to the rest protocols. |
thomaseizinger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good, thank you for the contributions! :)
|
FYI: We set all PRs that are queued for the next breaking change to draft to avoid accidentally merging them. |
Looks good to me, thank you! |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Could you please resolve them @leonzchang? 🙏 |
Approvals have been dismissed because the PR was updated after the send-it label was applied.
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Could you please resolve them @leonzchang? 🙏 |
Description
Related: #3844.
Notes & open questions
Change checklist