[5.5] [PSR-16] Implement SimpleCache #20194
Conversation
deleugpn
changed the title
| use Psr\SimpleCache\CacheInterface; | ||
|
|
||
| interface Repository | ||
| interface Repository extends CacheInterface |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel that this should be \Illuminate\Cache\Repository that implements Psr\SimpleCache\CacheInterface
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm doing here the same thing I did in psr-11: https://github.com/laravel/framework/pull/19822/files#diff-51bfc610692c3ed3388dec0ec04bd3baR8 for consistency
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah true, it' weird. I had a look at \Illuminate\Contracts\Container\Container too, which extends \Psr\Container\ContainerInterface
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nevertheless @deleugpn make sure to add this "psr/simple-cache": "~1.0" in Illuminate/Contracts/composer.json too 😉
| if (is_null($default)) { | ||
| return $this->many($keys); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why not just using an array ?
|
What benefits will this provide in terms of interop right now. Which libraries are using PSR-16? |
|
Some 120 packages : https://packagist.org/packages/psr/simple-cache/dependents |
|
Sigh, another PSR that no one is going to care about 😄 |
|
I appreciate the efforts. In then environment I work in, these interoperability patches really come in handy. |
|
I guess I cannot really answer to the question about interop. My proposal came from reading the survey from the PSR (which Laravel was included) and noticed that it was just a few steps away from becoming fully compatible: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ak2JdGialLildEM2UjlOdnA4ekg3R1Bfeng5eGlZc1E#gid=0 |
Examples? |
5 participants
Make Laravel 5.5 compliant with PSR-16