feat(l1,l2): allow eip 7702 on generic transactions #5460
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tomip01
requested review from
ManuelBilbao,
avilagaston9 and
ilitteri
as code owners
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR enables EIP-7702 transactions to be sent through GenericTransaction, providing support for setting EOA code delegation in the Ethereum client.
Key changes:
- Added
authorization_listfield toOverridesstruct for passing EIP-7702 authorization tuples - Implemented
TryFrom<GenericTransaction>forEIP7702Transactionto convert generic transactions into typed EIP-7702 transactions - Updated transaction handling logic to recognize and process EIP-7702 as a supported transaction type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
crates/networking/rpc/clients/eth/mod.rs |
Added AuthorizationTupleEntry import and authorization_list field to Overrides struct |
crates/l2/sdk/src/sdk.rs |
Added EIP-7702 transaction handling in send_generic_transaction and build_generic_tx, plus improved error messaging |
crates/common/types/transaction.rs |
Added MissingToField error variant and TryFrom implementation for converting GenericTransaction to EIP7702Transaction |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lines of code reportTotal lines added: Detailed view |
ilitteri
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2025
pablodeymo
reviewed
Nov 28, 2025
Co-authored-by: Pablo Deymonnaz <[email protected]>
JereSalo
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2025
crates/common/types/transaction.rs
Outdated
Comment on lines
2457
to
2460
| #[error("Missing fee token address")] | ||
| MissingFeeToken, | ||
| #[error("Missing To field")] | ||
| MissingToField, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it be better to have a MissingField(String) error specifying wich field is missing in the string param?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
We want to be able to send EIP 7702 transactions through
GenericTransactionDescription
authorization_listtoOverridesTryFromforGenericTransaction->EIP7702Transaction