Skip to content

Conversation

@edg-l
Copy link
Contributor

@edg-l edg-l commented Oct 15, 2025

Motivation

Currently missing.

@edg-l edg-l requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2025 09:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added the L1 Ethereum client label Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

Lines of code report

Total lines added: 32
Total lines removed: 0
Total lines changed: 32

Detailed view
+----------------------------------------------------+-------+------+
| File                                               | Lines | Diff |
+----------------------------------------------------+-------+------+
| ethrex/crates/blockchain/metrics/metrics_blocks.rs | 104   | +27  |
+----------------------------------------------------+-------+------+
| ethrex/crates/blockchain/payload.rs                | 665   | +5   |
+----------------------------------------------------+-------+------+

Copy link
Collaborator

@Arkenan Arkenan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to In Review in ethrex_l1 Oct 15, 2025
@edg-l edg-l added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit e06ea7b Oct 15, 2025
30 checks passed
@edg-l edg-l deleted the add_block_building_metric branch October 15, 2025 11:52
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in ethrex_l1 Oct 15, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
**Motivation**
In #4878 we forgot to register the metric so prometheus picks it up

<img width="2220" height="338" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83d24e97-9d68-41b3-88f6-cd0fdfb8d626"
/>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

L1 Ethereum client

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants