-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
docs(l1): add crate reviews #4729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive crate reviews for major ethrex components, focusing on concurrency patterns and complexity analysis. The changes introduce a systematic approach to evaluating code complexity and concurrency concerns across the codebase.
- Adds detailed reviews for 8 major crates with quantitative metrics and risk assessments
- Introduces toolkit scripts for automated complexity analysis and link generation
- Creates standardized templates and workflows for conducting consistent code reviews
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
docs/crate_reviews/README.md |
Tracker table summarizing all reviewed crates with LOC and complexity scores |
docs/crate_reviews/toolkit/analyze_crate.py |
Python script for extracting LOC, complexity, and concurrency signals from codebases |
docs/crate_reviews/toolkit/linkify_report_refs.py |
Post-processing tool to convert file references into GitHub permalinks |
docs/crate_reviews/toolkit/analysis_instructions.md |
Step-by-step checklist for conducting crate reviews |
docs/crate_reviews/toolkit/_report_template.md |
Standardized Markdown template for review reports |
docs/crate_reviews/toolkit/README.md |
Usage documentation for the review toolkit |
docs/crate_reviews/ethrex_*_review.md |
Individual crate review reports (8 files) |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| if not stripped: | ||
| continue | ||
| if in_block_comment: | ||
| code_lines += 0 |
Copilot
AI
Oct 2, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line has no effect since adding 0 doesn't change the value. This appears to be incomplete logic for handling lines inside block comments.
| code_lines += 0 | |
| continue |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| if __name__ == "__main__": | ||
| import sys |
Copilot
AI
Oct 2, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The sys import is redundant as sys is already imported at the top of the file (line 10).
| import sys |
Motivation
Have a review of each major crate, with a focus on concurrency
Description
Results can be seen here: https://github.com/lambdaclass/ethrex/tree/crate-reviews/docs/crate_reviews