[FMV] Allow multi versioning without default declaration. #1

labrinea · 2024-03-16T15:23:47Z

This was a limitation which has now been lifted upon request.
Please read the thread below for more details:

Basically it allows to separate versioned implementations across
different TUs without having to share private header files which
contain the default declaration.

If a resolver is required (because there is a caller in the TU),
then a default declaration is implicitly generated.

We would like the resolver to be generated eagerly, even if the versioned function is not called from the current translation unit. Fixes llvm#81494. It further allows Multi Versioning to work even if the default target version attribute is omitted from function declarations.

This was a limitation which has now been lifted upon request. Please read the thread below for more details: llvm#84405 (comment) Basically it allows to separate versioned implementations across different TUs without having to share private header files which contain the default declaration. If a resolver is required (because there is a caller in the TU), then a default declaration is implicitly generated.

jroelofs · 2024-03-19T22:13:29Z

clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp


+    if (!HasDefaultDecl) {
+      FunctionDecl *NewFD = createDefaultTargetVersionFrom(FD);
+      llvm::Constant *Func = createFunction(NewFD);


nit: the cast would be a tiny bit more useful up here.

Suggested change

llvm::Constant *Func = createFunction(NewFD);

auto *Func = cast<llvm::Function>(createFunction(NewFD));

…lvm#85653) This reverts commit daebe5c. This commit causes the following asan issue: ``` <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir | <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir # executed command: <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir # .---command stderr------------ # | ================================================================= # | ==2772558==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7fd2c2c42b90 at pc 0x55e406d54614 bp 0x7ffc810e4070 sp 0x7ffc810e4068 # | READ of size 8 at 0x7fd2c2c42b90 thread T0 # | #0 0x55e406d54613 in operator()<long int const*> /usr/include/c++/13/bits/predefined_ops.h:318 # | #1 0x55e406d54613 in __count_if<long int const*, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<long int>, ValueRange)::<lambda(int64_t)> > > /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_algobase.h:2125 # | #2 0x55e406d54613 in count_if<long int const*, mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, ... ```

…oint. (llvm#83821)" This reverts commit c2c1e6e. It creates a use after free. ==8342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x50f000001760 at pc 0x55b9fb84a8fb bp 0x7ffc18468a10 sp 0x7ffc18468a08 READ of size 1 at 0x50f000001760 thread T0 #0 0x55b9fb84a8fa in dropPoisonGeneratingFlags llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h:1040:13 #1 0x55b9fb84a8fa in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>)::$_0::operator()(llvm::VPRecipeBase*) const llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp:1236:23 #2 0x55b9fb84a196 in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>) llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp Can be reproduced with asan on Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-interleaved-masked-accesses.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/x86-interleaved-accesses-masked-group.ll

…e exception specification of a function (llvm#90760) [temp.deduct.general] p6 states: > At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template arguments. This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default arguments are substituted. [temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say: > The _deduction substitution loci_ are > - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_, > - the explicit-specifier, > - the template parameter declarations, and > - the template argument list of a partial specialization > > The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in the deduction substitution loci. [...] Consider the following: ```cpp struct A { static constexpr bool x = true; }; template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1 template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2 template<> void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject ``` Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate being ignored. This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the _noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated. As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the instantiation of the exception specification of a function template specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per [except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).

…ined member functions & member function templates (llvm#88963) Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector: ``` template<typename T> concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long); template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function template<> void f(char); // llvm#3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function }; template<> template<typename U> void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // llvm#4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template template<> template<> void A<int>::f(int); // llvm#5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template<> void A<long>::g(); // llvm#6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function ``` A number of problems exist: - Clang rejects `llvm#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U` substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated function template. - Clang rejects `llvm#5` because the function template specialization instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `llvm#5` does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function). - Clang rejects `llvm#6` for the same reasons it rejects `llvm#5`. This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes: - To fix `llvm#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed `FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_ of `llvm#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`. - To fix `llvm#5` and `llvm#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared for explicit specializations that declare functions. In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we previously would select the first function that has the same type as the explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we match EDG's behavior for these declarations.

...which caused issues like > ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28) > ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824) > #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c (this.program+0x14f73b0c) > #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2 (this.program+0x14f8a3c2) > #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*, unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1) > llvm#3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd) > llvm#4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df) > llvm#5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab (this.program+0x14f74eab) > llvm#6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a (this.program+0x14f73a1a) when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states "We don't support partial munmapping" (see <emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb> "Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode (llvm#16289)"). Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]>

…ication as used during partial ordering (llvm#91534) We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification when determining the primary template of a function template specialization or when taking the address of a function template. Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used' during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial] p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous: ``` template<typename T, typename U> void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1 template<typename T> void f(T*) noexcept; // #2 template<> void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied ``` Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).

…erSize (llvm#67657)" This reverts commit f0b3654. This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable. `UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the `UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized. ``` ==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17 #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19 llvm#3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7 llvm#4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13 llvm#5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30 llvm#6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9 [...] Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3 ```

…vm#90820) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, a template template parameter containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does. Given the following example: ```C++ template<class T2> struct A; template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1 template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2 template<class T1> struct B; template struct A<B<char>>; ``` Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized. After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous. With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again, maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations. The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before, a fixed-size list is more specialized. This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching during deduction. --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

…llvm#92855) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional wording introduced in llvm#89807 so it also covers deduction of class templates. Given the following example: ```C++ template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A; template <class T3> struct B; template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1 template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2 template struct B<A<int>>; ``` Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again. This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid: ```C++ template<class T, class U> struct A {}; A<int, float> v; template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>); // OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter. void g() { f(v); } ``` --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

@chapuni

The problematic program is as follows: ```shell #define pre_a 0 #define PRE(x) pre_##x void f(void) { PRE(a) && 0; } int main(void) { return 0; } ``` in which after token concatenation (`##`), there's another nested macro `pre_a`. Currently only the outer expansion region will be produced. ([compiler explorer link](https://godbolt.org/#g:!((g:!((g:!((h:codeEditor,i:(filename:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:1,lang:___c,selection:(endColumn:29,endLineNumber:8,positionColumn:29,positionLineNumber:8,selectionStartColumn:29,selectionStartLineNumber:8,startColumn:29,startLineNumber:8),source:'%23define+pre_a+0%0A%23define+PRE(x)+pre_%23%23x%0A%0Avoid+f(void)+%7B%0A++++PRE(a)+%26%26+0%3B%0A%7D%0A%0Aint+main(void)+%7B+return+0%3B+%7D'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'C+source+%231',t:'0')),k:51.69491525423727,l:'4',n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((g:!((h:compiler,i:(compiler:cclang_assertions_trunk,filters:(b:'0',binary:'1',binaryObject:'1',commentOnly:'0',debugCalls:'1',demangle:'0',directives:'0',execute:'0',intel:'0',libraryCode:'1',trim:'1',verboseDemangling:'0'),flagsViewOpen:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,lang:___c,libs:!(),options:'-fprofile-instr-generate+-fcoverage-mapping+-fcoverage-mcdc+-Xclang+-dump-coverage-mapping+',overrides:!(),selection:(endColumn:1,endLineNumber:1,positionColumn:1,positionLineNumber:1,selectionStartColumn:1,selectionStartLineNumber:1,startColumn:1,startLineNumber:1),source:1),l:'5',n:'0',o:'+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Editor+%231)',t:'0')),k:34.5741843594503,l:'4',m:28.903654485049834,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((h:output,i:(compilerName:'x86-64+clang+(trunk)',editorid:1,fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,wrap:'1'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'Output+of+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Compiler+%232)',t:'0')),header:(),l:'4',m:71.09634551495017,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0')),k:48.30508474576271,l:'3',n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),l:'2',m:100,n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),version:4)) ```text f: File 0, 4:14 -> 6:2 = #0 Decision,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:16 = M:0, C:2 Expansion,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:8 = #0 (Expanded file = 1) File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = #1 Branch,File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = 0, 0 [2,0,0] File 1, 2:16 -> 2:23 = #0 File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0 File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0 Branch,File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = 0, 0 [1,2,0] ``` The inner expansion region isn't produced because: 1. In the range-based for loop quoted below, each sloc is processed and possibly emit a corresponding expansion region. 2. For our sloc in question, its direct parent returned by `getIncludeOrExpansionLoc()` is a `<scratch space>`, because that's how `##` is processed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L518-L520 3. This `<scratch space>` cannot be found in the FileID mapping so `ParentFileID` will be assigned an `std::nullopt` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L521-L526 4. As a result this iteration of for loop finishes early and no expansion region is added for the sloc. This problem gets worse with MC/DC: as the example shows, there's a branch from File 2 but File 2 itself is missing. This will trigger assertion failures. The fix is more or less a workaround and takes a similar approach as llvm#89573. ~~Depends on llvm#89573.~~ This includes llvm#89573. Kudos to @chapuni! This and llvm#89573 together fix llvm#87000: I tested locally, both the reduced program and my original use case (fwiw, Linux kernel) can run successfully. --------- Co-authored-by: NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]>

…des (llvm#94453) LSR will generate chains of related instructions with a known increment between them. With SVE, in the case of the test case, this can include increments like 'vscale * 16 + 8'. The idea of this patch is if we have a '+8' increment already calculated in the chain, we can generate a (legal) '+ vscale*16' addressing mode from it, allowing us to use the '[x16, #1, mul vl]' addressing mode instructions. In order to do this we keep track of the known 'bases' when generating chains in GenerateIVChain, checking for each if the accumulated increment expression from the base neatly folds into a legal addressing mode. If they do not we fall back to the existing LeftOverExpr, whether it is legal or not. This is mostly orthogonal to llvm#88124, dealing with the generation of chains as opposed to rest of LSR. The existing vscale addressing mode work has greatly helped compared to the last time I looked at this, allowing us to check that the addressing modes are indeed legal.

…on (llvm#94752) Fixes llvm#62925. The following code: ```cpp #include <map> int main() { std::map m1 = {std::pair{"foo", 2}, {"bar", 3}}; // guide #2 std::map m2(m1.begin(), m1.end()); // guide #1 } ``` Is rejected by clang, but accepted by both gcc and msvc: https://godbolt.org/z/6v4fvabb5 . So basically CTAD with copy-list-initialization is rejected. Note that this exact code is also used in a cppreference article: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/deduction_guides I checked the C++11 and C++20 standard drafts to see whether suppressing user conversion is the correct thing to do for user conversions. Based on the standard I don't think that it is correct. ``` 13.3.1.4 Copy-initialization of class by user-defined conversion [over.match.copy] Under the conditions specified in 8.5, as part of a copy-initialization of an object of class type, a user-defined conversion can be invoked to convert an initializer expression to the type of the object being initialized. Overload resolution is used to select the user-defined conversion to be invoked ``` So we could use user defined conversions according to the standard. ``` If a narrowing conversion is required to initialize any of the elements, the program is ill-formed. ``` We should not do narrowing. ``` In copy-list-initialization, if an explicit constructor is chosen, the initialization is ill-formed. ``` We should not use explicit constructors.

`rethrow` instruction is a terminator, but when when its DAG is built in `SelectionDAGBuilder` in a custom routine, it was NOT treated as such. ```ll rethrow: ; preds = %catch.start invoke void @llvm.wasm.rethrow() #1 [ "funclet"(token %1) ] to label %unreachable unwind label %ehcleanup ehcleanup: ; preds = %rethrow, %catch.dispatch %tmp = phi i32 [ 10, %catch.dispatch ], [ 20, %rethrow ] ... ``` In this bitcode, because of the `phi`, a `CONST_I32` will be created in the `rethrow` BB. Without this patch, the DAG for the `rethrow` BB looks like this: ``` t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20> t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t0, TargetConstant:i32<12161> t6: ch = TokenFactor t3, t5 t8: ch = br t6, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x562532e43c50> ``` Note that `CopyToReg` and `llvm.wasm.rethrow` don't have dependence so either can come first in the selected code, which can result in the code like ```mir bb.3.rethrow: RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments ``` After this patch, `llvm.wasm.rethrow` is treated as a terminator, and the DAG will look like ``` t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20> t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t3, TargetConstant:i32<12161> t7: ch = br t5, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x5555e3d32c70> ``` Note that now `rethrow` takes a token from `CopyToReg`, so `rethrow` has to come after `CopyToReg`. And the resulting code will be ```mir bb.3.rethrow: %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments ``` I'm not very familiar with the internals of `getRoot` vs. `getControlRoot`, but other terminator instructions seem to use the latter, and using it for `rethrow` too worked.

…arallel fusion llvm#94391 (llvm#97607)" This reverts commit edbc0e3. Reason for rollback. ASAN complains about this PR: ==4320==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x502000006cd8 at pc 0x55e2978d63cf bp 0x7ffe6431c2b0 sp 0x7ffe6431c2a8 READ of size 8 at 0x502000006cd8 thread T0 #0 0x55e2978d63ce in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 #1 0x55e2978d63ce in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:156:11 #2 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 llvm#3 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 llvm#4 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 llvm#5 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 llvm#6 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 llvm#7 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 llvm#8 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 llvm#9 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 llvm#10 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 llvm#11 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 llvm#12 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 llvm#13 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 llvm#14 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 llvm#15 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 llvm#16 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#17 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#18 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 llvm#19 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 llvm#20 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 llvm#21 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 llvm#22 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 llvm#23 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 llvm#24 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 llvm#25 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 llvm#26 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#27 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#28 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 llvm#29 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 llvm#30 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 llvm#31 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 llvm#32 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 llvm#33 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 llvm#34 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 llvm#35 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 llvm#36 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) llvm#37 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 0x502000006cd8 is located 8 bytes inside of 16-byte region [0x502000006cd0,0x502000006ce0) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130b7e2 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:155:3 #1 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_operator_delete<void *, unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979eb657 in __do_deallocate_handle_size<> llvm#3 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_deallocate llvm#4 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate llvm#5 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate llvm#6 0x55e2979eb657 in operator() llvm#7 0x55e2979eb657 in ~vector llvm#8 0x55e2979eb657 in mlir::Block::~Block() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:24:1 llvm#9 0x55e2979ebc17 in deleteNode llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:42:39 llvm#10 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:205:5 llvm#11 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:209:39 llvm#12 0x55e2979ebc17 in mlir::Block::erase() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:67:28 llvm#13 0x55e297aef978 in mlir::RewriterBase::eraseBlock(mlir::Block*) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:245:10 llvm#14 0x55e297af0563 in mlir::RewriterBase::inlineBlockBefore(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<mlir::Operation, false, false, void, false, void>, false, false>, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:331:3 llvm#15 0x55e297af06d8 in mlir::RewriterBase::mergeBlocks(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:341:3 llvm#16 0x55e297036608 in mlir::scf::ForOp::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:575:12 llvm#17 0x55e2970673ca in mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::scf::ForOp>::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.h.inc:658:56 llvm#18 0x55e2978d5feb in replaceWithAdditionalYields blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp.inc:105:14 llvm#19 0x55e2978d5feb in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:135:14 llvm#20 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 llvm#21 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 llvm#22 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 llvm#23 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 llvm#24 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 llvm#25 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 llvm#26 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 llvm#27 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 llvm#28 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 llvm#29 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 llvm#30 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 llvm#31 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 llvm#32 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 llvm#33 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 llvm#34 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#35 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#36 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 llvm#37 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 llvm#38 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 llvm#39 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 llvm#40 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 llvm#41 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 llvm#42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 llvm#44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 llvm#47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 llvm#48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130ab5d in operator new(unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:86:3 #1 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_operator_new<unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_allocate llvm#3 0x55e2979ed5d4 in allocate llvm#4 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __allocate_at_least<std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > llvm#5 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __split_buffer llvm#6 0x55e2979ed5d4 in mlir::BlockArgument* std::__u::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>>::__push_back_slow_path<mlir::BlockArgument const&>(mlir::BlockArgument const&) llvm#7 0x55e2979ec0f2 in push_back llvm#8 0x55e2979ec0f2 in mlir::Block::addArgument(mlir::Type, mlir::Location) mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:154:13 llvm#9 0x55e29796e457 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2172:34 llvm#10 0x55e29796e457 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 llvm#11 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 llvm#12 0x55e297035742 in mlir::scf::ForOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:521:14 llvm#13 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 llvm#14 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 llvm#15 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#16 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#17 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 llvm#18 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 llvm#19 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 llvm#20 0x55e297971d20 in parseBlockBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2296:9 llvm#21 0x55e297971d20 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseBlock(mlir::Block*&) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2226:12 llvm#22 0x55e29796e4f5 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2184:7 llvm#23 0x55e29796e4f5 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 llvm#24 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 llvm#25 0x55e29796b2cf in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseOptionalRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1796:12 llvm#26 0x55e2978d89ff in mlir::function_interface_impl::parseFunctionOp(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&, bool, mlir::StringAttr, llvm::function_ref<mlir::Type (mlir::Builder&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, mlir::function_interface_impl::VariadicFlag, std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>&)>, mlir::StringAttr, mlir::StringAttr) mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionImplementation.cpp:232:14 llvm#27 0x55e2969ba41d in mlir::func::FuncOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.cpp:203:10 llvm#28 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 llvm#29 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 llvm#30 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#31 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#32 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 llvm#33 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 llvm#34 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 llvm#35 0x55e297959b78 in parse mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2725:20 llvm#36 0x55e297959b78 in mlir::parseAsmSourceFile(llvm::SourceMgr const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::AsmParserState*, mlir::AsmParserCodeCompleteContext*) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2785:41 llvm#37 0x55e29790d5c2 in mlir::parseSourceFile(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::LocationAttr*) mlir/lib/Parser/Parser.cpp:46:10 llvm#38 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp, const std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> &> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:159:14 llvm#39 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:189:10 llvm#40 0x55e291ebbfe2 in mlir::parseSourceFileForTool(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::ParserConfig const&, bool) mlir/include/mlir/Tools/ParseUtilities.h:31:12 llvm#41 0x55e291ebb263 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:383:33 llvm#42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 llvm#44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 llvm#47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 llvm#48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 llvm#52 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 llvm#53 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 llvm#54 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) llvm#55 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x502000006a00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006a80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006b00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006b80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006c00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa fd fa =>0x502000006c80: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fd fa fa fd[fd]fa fa fd fd 0x502000006d00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006d80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006f00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==4320==ABORTING

This patch adds a frame recognizer for Clang's `__builtin_verbose_trap`, which behaves like a `__builtin_trap`, but emits a failure-reason string into debug-info in order for debuggers to display it to a user. The frame recognizer triggers when we encounter a frame with a function name that begins with `__clang_trap_msg`, which is the magic prefix Clang emits into debug-info for verbose traps. Once such frame is encountered we display the frame function name as the `Stop Reason` and display that frame to the user. Example output: ``` (lldb) run warning: a.out was compiled with optimization - stepping may behave oddly; variables may not be available. Process 35942 launched: 'a.out' (arm64) Process 35942 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] 1 struct Dummy { 2 void func() { -> 3 __builtin_verbose_trap("Misc.", "Function is not implemented"); 4 } 5 }; 6 7 int main() { (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #0: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] __clang_trap_msg$Misc.$Function is not implemented$ at verbose_trap.cpp:0 [opt] * frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] frame #2: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main at verbose_trap.cpp:8:13 [opt] frame llvm#3: 0x0000000189d518b4 dyld`start + 1988 ```

…linux (llvm#99613) Examples of the output: ARM: ``` # ./a.out AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000007a (pc 0x76e13ac0 bp 0x7eb7fd00 sp 0x7eb7fcc8 T0) ==122==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==122==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x76e13ac0 (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) #1 0x76dce680 in gsignal (/lib/libc.so.6+0x37680) #2 0x005c2250 (/root/a.out+0x145250) llvm#3 0x76db982c (/lib/libc.so.6+0x2282c) llvm#4 0x76db9918 in __libc_start_main (/lib/libc.so.6+0x22918) ==122==Register values: r0 = 0x00000000 r1 = 0x0000007a r2 = 0x0000000b r3 = 0x76d95020 r4 = 0x0000007a r5 = 0x00000001 r6 = 0x005dcc5c r7 = 0x0000010c r8 = 0x0000000b r9 = 0x76f9ece0 r10 = 0x00000000 r11 = 0x7eb7fd00 r12 = 0x76dce670 sp = 0x7eb7fcc8 lr = 0x76e13ab4 pc = 0x76e13ac0 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) ==122==ABORTING ``` AArch64: ``` # ./a.out UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ==99==ERROR: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000063 (pc 0x007fbbbc5860 bp 0x007fcfdcb700 sp 0x007fcfdcb700 T99) ==99==The signal is caused by a UNKNOWN memory access. ==99==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x007fbbbc5860 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) #1 0x007fbbb81578 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3e578) #2 0x00556051152c (/root/a.out+0x3152c) llvm#3 0x007fbbb6e268 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b268) llvm#4 0x007fbbb6e344 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b344) llvm#5 0x0055604e45ec (/root/a.out+0x45ec) ==99==Register values: x0 = 0x0000000000000000 x1 = 0x0000000000000063 x2 = 0x000000000000000b x3 = 0x0000007fbbb41440 x4 = 0x0000007fbbb41580 x5 = 0x3669288942d44cce x6 = 0x0000000000000000 x7 = 0x00000055605110b0 x8 = 0x0000000000000083 x9 = 0x0000000000000000 x10 = 0x0000000000000000 x11 = 0x0000000000000000 x12 = 0x0000007fbbdb3360 x13 = 0x0000000000010000 x14 = 0x0000000000000039 x15 = 0x00000000004113a0 x16 = 0x0000007fbbb81560 x17 = 0x0000005560540138 x18 = 0x000000006474e552 x19 = 0x0000000000000063 x20 = 0x0000000000000001 x21 = 0x000000000000000b x22 = 0x0000005560511510 x23 = 0x0000007fcfdcb918 x24 = 0x0000007fbbdb1b50 x25 = 0x0000000000000000 x26 = 0x0000007fbbdb2000 x27 = 0x000000556053f858 x28 = 0x0000000000000000 fp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 lr = 0x0000007fbbbc584c sp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) ==99==ABORTING ```

…lvm#104148) `hasOperands` does not always execute matchers in the order they are written. This can cause issue in code using bindings when one operand matcher is relying on a binding set by the other. With this change, the first matcher present in the code is always executed first and any binding it sets are available to the second matcher. Simple example with current version (1 match) and new version (2 matches): ```bash > cat tmp.cpp int a = 13; int b = ((int) a) - a; int c = a - ((int) a); > clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here int a = 13; ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here int b = ((int)a) - a; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 match. > ./build/bin/clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here 2 | int b = ((int)a) - a; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Match #2: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:3:9: note: "root" binds here 3 | int c = a - ((int)a); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 matches. ``` If this should be documented or regression tested anywhere please let me know where.

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame llvm#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame llvm#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame llvm#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame llvm#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame llvm#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame llvm#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame llvm#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame llvm#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame llvm#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```

…abort (llvm#117603) Hey guys, I found that Flang's built-in ABORT function is incomplete when I was using it. Compared with gfortran's ABORT (which can both abort and print out a backtrace), flang's ABORT implementation lacks the function of printing out a backtrace. This feature is essential for debugging and understanding the call stack at the failure point. To solve this problem, I completed the "// TODO:" of the abort function, and then implemented an additional built-in function BACKTRACE for flang. After a brief reading of the relevant source code, I used backtrace and backtrace_symbols in "execinfo.h" to quickly implement this. But since I used the above two functions directly, my implementation is slightly different from gfortran's implementation (in the output, the function call stack before main is additionally output, and the function line number is missing). In addition, since I used the above two functions, I did not need to add -g to embed debug information into the ELF file, but needed -rdynamic to ensure that the symbols are added to the dynamic symbol table (so that the function name will be printed out). Here is a comparison of the output between gfortran 's backtrace and my implementation: gfortran's implemention output: ``` #0 0x557eb71f4184 in testfun2_ at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:5 #1 0x557eb71f4165 in testfun1_ at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:13 #2 0x557eb71f4192 in test_backtrace at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:17 llvm#3 0x557eb71f41ce in main at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:18 ``` my impelmention output: ``` Backtrace: #0 ./test(_FortranABacktrace+0x32) [0x574f07efcf92] #1 ./test(testfun2_+0x14) [0x574f07efc7b4] #2 ./test(testfun1_+0xd) [0x574f07efc7cd] llvm#3 ./test(_QQmain+0x9) [0x574f07efc7e9] llvm#4 ./test(main+0x12) [0x574f07efc802] llvm#5 /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x25e08) [0x76954694fe08] llvm#6 /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8c) [0x76954694fecc] llvm#7 ./test(_start+0x25) [0x574f07efc6c5] ``` test program is: ``` function testfun2() result(err) implicit none integer :: err err = 1 call backtrace end function testfun2 subroutine testfun1() implicit none integer :: err integer :: testfun2 err = testfun2() end subroutine testfun1 program test_backtrace call testfun1() end program test_backtrace ``` I am well aware of the importance of line numbers, so I am now working on implementing line numbers (by parsing DWARF information) and supporting cross-platform (Windows) support.

…ne symbol size as symbols are created (llvm#117079)" This reverts commit ba668eb. Below test started failing again on x86_64 macOS CI. We're unsure if this patch is the exact cause, but since this patch has broken this test before, we speculatively revert it to see if it was indeed the root cause. ``` FAIL: lldb-shell :: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test (1692 of 2162) ******************** TEST 'lldb-shell :: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- RUN: at line 7: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode-beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/call-asm.c /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/trap_frame_sym_ctx.s -o /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp + /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode-beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/call-asm.c /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/trap_frame_sym_ctx.s -o /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] RUN: at line 8: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/lldb --no-lldbinit -S /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/lit-lldb-init-quiet /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp -s /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test -o exit | /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/FileCheck /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test + /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/lldb --no-lldbinit -S /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/lit-lldb-init-quiet /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp -s /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test -o exit + /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/FileCheck /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test:21:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input ^ <stdin>:26:64: note: scanning from here frame #1: 0x0000000100003ee9 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`tramp ^ <stdin>:27:2: note: possible intended match here frame #2: 0x00007ff7bfeff6c0 ^ Input file: <stdin> Check file: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test -dump-input=help explains the following input dump. Input was: <<<<<< . . . 21: 0x100003ed1 <+0>: pushq %rbp 22: 0x100003ed2 <+1>: movq %rsp, %rbp 23: (lldb) thread backtrace -u 24: * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 25: * frame #0: 0x0000000100003ecc trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`bar 26: frame #1: 0x0000000100003ee9 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`tramp check:21'0 X error: no match found 27: frame #2: 0x00007ff7bfeff6c0 check:21'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ check:21'1 ? possible intended match 28: frame llvm#3: 0x0000000100003ec6 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`main + 22 check:21'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 29: frame llvm#4: 0x0000000100003ec6 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`main + 22 check:21'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 30: frame llvm#5: 0x00007ff8193cc41f dyld`start + 1903 check:21'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 31: (lldb) exit check:21'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>>> ```

## Description This PR fixes a segmentation fault that occurs when passing options requiring arguments via `-Xopenmp-target=<triple>`. The issue was that the function `Driver::getOffloadArchs` did not properly parse the extracted option, but instead assumed it was valid, leading to a crash when incomplete arguments were provided. ## Backtrace ```sh llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o 1. Compilation construction 2. Building compilation actions #0 0x0000562fb21c363b llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x392f63b) #1 0x0000562fb21c0e3c SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0 #2 0x00007fcbf6c81420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420) llvm#3 0x0000562fb1fa5d70 llvm::opt::Option::matches(llvm::opt::OptSpecifier) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x3711d70) llvm#4 0x0000562fb2a78e7d clang::driver::Driver::getOffloadArchs(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList const&, clang::driver::Action::OffloadKind, clang::driver::ToolChain const*, bool) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e4e7d) llvm#5 0x0000562fb2a7a9aa clang::driver::Driver::BuildOffloadingActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*> const&, clang::driver::Action*) const (.part.1164) Driver.cpp:0:0 llvm#6 0x0000562fb2a7c093 clang::driver::Driver::BuildActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, llvm::SmallVector<std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*>, 16u> const&, llvm::SmallVector<clang::driver::Action*, 3u>&) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e8093) llvm#7 0x0000562fb2a8395d clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41ef95d) llvm#8 0x0000562faf92684c clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x109284c) llvm#9 0x0000562faf826cc6 main (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0xf92cc6) llvm#10 0x00007fcbf6699083 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-LcI20x/glibc-2.31/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:342:3 llvm#11 0x0000562faf923a5e _start (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x108fa5e) [1] 2628042 segmentation fault (core dumped) main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o ```

llvm#118923) …d reentry. These utilities provide new, more generic and easier to use support for lazy compilation in ORC. LazyReexportsManager is an alternative to LazyCallThroughManager. It takes requests for lazy re-entry points in the form of an alias map: lazy-reexports = { ( <entry point symbol #1>, <implementation symbol #1> ), ( <entry point symbol #2>, <implementation symbol #2> ), ... ( <entry point symbol #n>, <implementation symbol #n> ) } LazyReexportsManager then: 1. binds the entry points to the implementation names in an internal table. 2. creates a JIT re-entry trampoline for each entry point. 3. creates a redirectable symbol for each of the entry point name and binds redirectable symbol to the corresponding reentry trampoline. When an entry point symbol is first called at runtime (which may be on any thread of the JIT'd program) it will re-enter the JIT via the trampoline and trigger a lookup for the implementation symbol stored in LazyReexportsManager's internal table. When the lookup completes the entry point symbol will be updated (via the RedirectableSymbolManager) to point at the implementation symbol, and execution will proceed to the implementation symbol. Actual construction of the re-entry trampolines and redirectable symbols is delegated to an EmitTrampolines functor and the RedirectableSymbolsManager respectively. JITLinkReentryTrampolines.h provides a JITLink-based implementation of the EmitTrampolines functor. (AArch64 only in this patch, but other architectures will be added in the near future). Register state save and reentry functionality is added to the ORC runtime in the __orc_rt_sysv_resolve and __orc_rt_resolve_implementation functions (the latter is generic, the former will need custom implementations for each ABI and architecture to be supported, however this should be much less effort than the existing OrcABISupport approach, since the ORC runtime allows this code to be written as native assembly). The resulting system: 1. Works equally well for in-process and out-of-process JIT'd code. 2. Requires less boilerplate to set up. Given an ObjectLinkingLayer and PlatformJD (JITDylib containing the ORC runtime), setup is just: ```c++ auto RSMgr = JITLinkRedirectableSymbolManager::Create(OLL); if (!RSMgr) return RSMgr.takeError(); auto LRMgr = createJITLinkLazyReexportsManager(OLL, **RSMgr, PlatformJD); if (!LRMgr) return LRMgr.takeError(); ``` after which lazy reexports can be introduced with: ```c++ JD.define(lazyReexports(LRMgr, <alias map>)); ``` LazyObectLinkingLayer is updated to use this new method, but the LLVM-IR level CompileOnDemandLayer will continue to use LazyCallThroughManager and OrcABISupport until the new system supports a wider range of architectures and ABIs. The llvm-jitlink utility's -lazy option now uses the new scheme. Since it depends on the ORC runtime, the lazy-link.ll testcase and associated helpers are moved to the ORC runtime.

According to the documentation described at https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/ladwarf.adoc, the dwarf numbers for floating-point registers range from 32 to 63. An incorrect dwarf number will prevent the register values from being properly restored during unwinding. This test reflects this problem: ``` loongson@linux:~$ cat test.c void foo() { asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); } int main() { asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); foo(); return 0; } loongson@linux:~$ clang -g test.c -o test ``` Without this patch: ``` loongson@linux:~$ ./_build/bin/lldb ./t (lldb) target create "./t" Current executable set to '/home/loongson/llvm-project/_build_lldb/t' (loongarch64). (lldb) b foo Breakpoint 1: where = t`foo + 20 at test.c:4:1, address = 0x0000000000000714 (lldb) r Process 2455626 launched: '/home/loongson/llvm-project/_build_lldb/t' (loongarch64) Process 2455626 stopped * thread #1, name = 't', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000555555554714 t`foo at test.c:4:1 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 void foo() { -> 4 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); (lldb) si Process 2455626 stopped * thread #1, name = 't', stop reason = instruction step into frame #0: 0x0000555555554718 t`foo at test.c:4:1 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 void foo() { -> 4 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); (lldb) f 1 frame #1: 0x0000555555554768 t`main at test.c:8:1 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); -> 8 foo(); 9 return 0; 10 } (lldb) register read -a General Purpose Registers: r1 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 r3 = 0x00007ffffffef780 r22 = 0x00007ffffffef7b0 r23 = 0x00007ffffffef918 r24 = 0x0000000000000001 r25 = 0x0000000000000000 r26 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry r27 = 0x0000555555554740 t`main at test.c:6 r28 = 0x00007ffffffef928 r29 = 0x00007ffff7febc88 ld-linux-loongarch-lp64d.so.1`_rtld_global_ro r30 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry pc = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 33 registers were unavailable. Floating Point Registers: f13 = 0x00007ffffffef780 !!!!! wrong register f24 = 0xffffffffffffffff f25 = 0xffffffffffffffff f26 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 f27 = 0xffffffffffffffff f28 = 0xffffffffffffffff f29 = 0xffffffffffffffff f30 = 0xffffffffffffffff f31 = 0xffffffffffffffff 32 registers were unavailable. ``` With this patch: ``` The previous operations are the same. (lldb) register read -a General Purpose Registers: r1 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 r3 = 0x00007ffffffef780 r22 = 0x00007ffffffef7b0 r23 = 0x00007ffffffef918 r24 = 0x0000000000000001 r25 = 0x0000000000000000 r26 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry r27 = 0x0000555555554740 t`main at test.c:6 r28 = 0x00007ffffffef928 r29 = 0x00007ffff7febc88 ld-linux-loongarch-lp64d.so.1`_rtld_global_ro r30 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry pc = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 33 registers were unavailable. Floating Point Registers: f24 = 0xffffffffffffffff f25 = 0xffffffffffffffff f26 = 0x00007ffffffef780 f27 = 0xffffffffffffffff f28 = 0xffffffffffffffff f29 = 0xffffffffffffffff f30 = 0xffffffffffffffff f31 = 0xffffffffffffffff 33 registers were unavailable. ``` Reviewed By: SixWeining Pull Request: llvm#120391

Fix for the Coverity hit with CID1579964 in VPlan.cpp. Coverity message with some context follows. [Cov] var_compare_op: Comparing TermBr to null implies that TermBr might be null. 434 } else if (TermBr && !TermBr->isConditional()) { 435 TermBr->setSuccessor(0, NewBB); 436 } else { 437 // Set each forward successor here when it is created, excluding 438 // backedges. A backward successor is set when the branch is created. 439 unsigned idx = PredVPSuccessors.front() == this ? 0 : 1; [Cov] CID 1579964: (#1 of 1): Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) [Cov] var_deref_model: Passing null pointer TermBr to getSuccessor, which dereferences it.

This will be sent by Arm's Guarded Control Stack extension when an invalid return is executed. The signal does have an address we could show, but it's the PC at which the fault occured. The debugger has plenty of ways to show you that already, so I've left it out. ``` (lldb) c Process 460 resuming Process 460 stopped * thread #1, name = 'test', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: control protection fault frame #0: 0x0000000000400784 test`main at main.c:57:1 54 afunc(); 55 printf("return from main\n"); 56 return 0; -> 57 } (lldb) dis <...> -> 0x400784 <+100>: ret ``` The new test case generates the signal by corrupting the link register then attempting to return. This will work whether we manually enable GCS or the C library does it for us. (in the former case you could just return from main and it would fault)

llvm#123877) Reverts llvm#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g., https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio ASan output from local re-run: ``` ==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8 READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0 #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344 #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9 #2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42 llvm#3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40 llvm#4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3 llvm#5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15 llvm#6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3 llvm#7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15 llvm#8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12 llvm#9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15 llvm#10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12 llvm#11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12 llvm#12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3 llvm#13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14 llvm#14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14 llvm#15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10 llvm#16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 llvm#17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3 llvm#18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60) ```

Prevents avoidable memory leaks. Looks like exchange added in aa1333a didn't take "continue" into account. ``` ==llc==2150782==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 10 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x5f1b0f9ac14a in strdup llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:593:3 #1 0x5f1b1768428d in FileToRemoveList llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:105:55 ```

… pointers (llvm#132261) Currently, the helpers to get fir::ExtendedValue out of hlfir::Entity use hlfir.declare second result (`#1`) in most cases. This is because this result is the same as the input and matches what FIR was getting before lowering to HLFIR. But this creates odd situations when both hlfir.declare are raw pointers and either result ends-up being used in the IR depending on whether the code was generated by a helper using fir::ExtendedValue, or via "pure HLFIR" helpers using the first result. This will typically prevent simple CSE and easy identification that two operation (e.g load/store) are touching the exact same memory location without using alias analysis or "manual detection" (looking for common hlfir.declare defining op). Hence, when hlfir.declare results are both raw pointers, use `#0` when producing `fir::ExtendedValue`. When `#0` is a fir.box, keep using `#1` because these are not the same. The only code change is in HLFIRTools.cpp and is pretty small, but there is a big test fallout of `#1` to `#0`.

…too. (llvm#132267) Observed in Wine when trying to intercept `ExitThread`, which forwards to `ntdll.RtlExitUserThread`. `gdb` interprets it as `xchg %ax,%ax`. `llvm-mc` outputs simply `nop`. ``` ==Asan-i386-calls-Dynamic-Test.exe==964==interception_win: unhandled instruction at 0x7be27cf0: 66 90 55 89 e5 56 50 8b ``` ``` Wine-gdb> bt #0 0x789a1766 in __interception::GetInstructionSize (address=<optimized out>, rel_offset=<optimized out>) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:983 #1 0x789ab480 in __sanitizer::SharedPrintfCode(bool, char const*, char*) () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_printf.cpp:311 #2 0x789a18e7 in __interception::OverrideFunctionWithHotPatch (old_func=2078440688, new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1118 llvm#3 0x789a1f34 in __interception::OverrideFunction (old_func=2078440688, new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1224 llvm#4 0x789a24ce in __interception::OverrideFunction (func_name=0x78a0bc43 <vtable for __asan::AsanThreadContext+1163> "ExitThread", new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1369 llvm#5 0x789f40ef in __asan::InitializePlatformInterceptors () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_win.cpp:190 llvm#6 0x789e0c3c in __asan::InitializeAsanInterceptors () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:802 llvm#7 0x789ee6b5 in __asan::AsanInitInternal () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:442 llvm#8 0x789eefb0 in __asan::AsanInitFromRtl () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:522 llvm#9 __asan::AsanInitializer::AsanInitializer (this=<optimized out>) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:542 llvm#10 __cxx_global_var_init () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:546 ... Wine-gdb> disassemble /r 2078440688,2078440688+20 Dump of assembler code from 0x7be27cf0 to 0x7be27d04: 0x7be27cf0 <_RtlExitUserThread@4+0>: 66 90 xchg %ax,%ax ... ```

… `getForwardSlice` matchers (llvm#115670) Improve mlir-query tool by implementing `getBackwardSlice` and `getForwardSlice` matchers. As an addition `SetQuery` also needed to be added to enable custom configuration for each query. e.g: `inclusive`, `omitUsesFromAbove`, `omitBlockArguments`. Note: backwardSlice and forwardSlice algoritms are the same as the ones in `mlir/lib/Analysis/SliceAnalysis.cpp` Example of current matcher. The query was made to the file: `mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir` ```mlir ./mlir-query /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir -c "match getDefinitions(hasOpName(\"arith.add f\"),2)" Match #1: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:5:8: %0 = linalg.generic {indexing_maps = [#map, #map], iterator_types = ["parallel", "parallel"]} ins(%arg0 : tensor<5x5xf32>) outs(%arg1 : tensor<5x5xf32>) { ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:7:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %in, %in : f32 ^ Match #2: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:10:16: %collapsed = tensor.collapse_shape %0 [[0, 1]] : tensor<5x5xf32> into tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:13:11: %c2 = arith.constant 2 : index ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:14:18: %extracted = tensor.extract %collapsed[%c2] : tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:15:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %extracted, %extracted : f32 ^ 2 matches. ```

…142952) This was removed in llvm#135343 in favour of making it a format variable, which we do here. This follows the precedent of the `[opt]` and `[artificial]` markers. Before: ``` thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 * frame #0: 0x000000010000037c a.out`inlined1() at inline.cpp:4:3 frame #1: 0x000000010000037c a.out`regular() at inline.cpp:6:17 frame #2: 0x00000001000003b8 a.out`inlined2() at inline.cpp:7:43 frame llvm#3: 0x00000001000003b4 a.out`main at inline.cpp:10:3 frame llvm#4: 0x0000000186345be4 dyld`start + 7040 ``` After (note the `[inlined]` markers): ``` thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 * frame #0: 0x000000010000037c a.out`inlined1() at inline.cpp:4:3 [inlined] frame #1: 0x000000010000037c a.out`regular() at inline.cpp:6:17 frame #2: 0x00000001000003b8 a.out`inlined2() at inline.cpp:7:43 [inlined] frame llvm#3: 0x00000001000003b4 a.out`main at inline.cpp:10:3 frame llvm#4: 0x0000000186345be4 dyld`start + 7040 ``` rdar://152642178

# Benefit This patch fixes: 1. After `platform select ios-simulator`, `platform process list` will now print processes which are running in the iOS simulator. Previously, no process will be listed. 2. After `platform select ios-simulator`, `platform attach --name <name>` will succeed. Previously, it will error out saying no process is found. # Several bugs that is being fixed 1. During the process listing, add `aarch64` to the list of CPU types for which iOS simulators are checked for. 2. Given a candidate process, when checking for simulators, the original code will find the desired environment variable (`SIMULATOR_UDID`) and set the OS to iOS, but then the immediate next environment variable will set it back to macOS. 3. For processes running on simulator, set the triple's `Environment` to `Simulator`, so that such processes can pass the filtering [in this line](https://fburl.com/8nivnrjx). The original code leave it as the default `UnknownEnvironment`. # Manual test **With this patch:** ``` royshi-mac-home ~/public_llvm/build % bin/lldb (lldb) platform select ios-simulator (lldb) platform process list 240 matching processes were found on "ios-simulator" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================ 40511 28844 royshi arm64-apple-ios-simulator FocusPlayground // my toy iOS app running on simulator ... // omit 28844 1 royshi arm64-apple-ios-simulator launchd_sim (lldb) process attach --name FocusPlayground Process 40511 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP frame #0: 0x0000000104e3cb70 libsystem_kernel.dylib`mach_msg2_trap + 8 libsystem_kernel.dylib`mach_msg2_trap: -> 0x104e3cb70 <+8>: ret ... // omit ``` **Without this patch:** ``` $ bin/lldb (lldb) platform select ios-simulator (lldb) platform process list error: no processes were found on the "ios-simulator" platform (lldb) process attach --name FocusPlayground error: attach failed: could not find a process named FocusPlayground ``` # Unittest See PR.

The function already exposes a work list to avoid deep recursion, this commit starts utilizing it in a helper that could also lead to a deep recursion. We have observed this crash on `clang/test/C/C99/n590.c` with our internal builds that enable aggressive optimizations and hit the limit earlier than default release builds of Clang. See the added test for an example with a deeper recursion that used to crash in upstream Clang before this change with the following stack trace: ``` #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:13 #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18 #2 SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:0:3 llvm#3 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3fdf0) llvm#4 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12772:0 llvm#5 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#6 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#7 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 llvm#8 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#9 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#10 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 llvm#11 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#12 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#13 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 llvm#14 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#15 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#16 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 llvm#17 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#18 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#19 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 ... 700+ more stack frames. ```

Fix unnecessary conversion of C-String to StringRef in the `Cmp` lambda inside `lookupLLVMIntrinsicByName`. This both fixes an ASAN error in the code that happens when the `Name` StringRef passed in is not a Null terminated StringRef, and additionally can potentially speed up the code as well by eliminating the unnecessary computation of string length every time a C String is converted to StringRef in this code (It seems practically this computation is eliminated in optimized builds, but this will avoid it in O0 builds as well). Added a unit test that demonstrates this issue by building LLVM with these options: ``` CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug LLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address LLVM_OPTIMIZE_SANITIZED_BUILDS=OFF ``` The error reported is as follows: ``` ==462665==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x5030000391a2 at pc 0x56525cc30bbf bp 0x7fff9e4ccc60 sp 0x7fff9e4cc428 READ of size 19 at 0x5030000391a2 thread T0 #0 0x56525cc30bbe in strlen (upstream-llvm-second/llvm-project/build/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x713bbe) (BuildId: 0651acf1e582a4d2) #1 0x7f8ff22ad334 in std::char_traits<char>::length(char const*) /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/char_traits.h:399:9 #2 0x7f8ff22a34a0 in llvm::StringRef::StringRef(char const*) /home/rjoshi/upstream-llvm-second/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:96:33 llvm#3 0x7f8ff28ca184 in _ZZL25lookupLLVMIntrinsicByNameN4llvm8ArrayRefIjEENS_9StringRefES2_ENK3$_0clIjPKcEEDaT_T0_ upstream-llvm-second/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Intrinsics.cpp:673:18 ```

…lvm#148205) In the original motivating test case, [FoldList](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d8a2141ff98ee35cd1886f536ccc3548b012820b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp#L1764) had entries: ``` #0: UseMI: %224:sreg_32 = S_OR_B32 %219.sub0:sreg_64, %219.sub1:sreg_64, implicit-def dead $scc UseOpNo: 1 #1: UseMI: %224:sreg_32 = S_OR_B32 %219.sub0:sreg_64, %219.sub1:sreg_64, implicit-def dead $scc UseOpNo: 2 ``` After calling [updateOperand(#0)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d8a2141ff98ee35cd1886f536ccc3548b012820b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp#L1773), [tryConstantFoldOp(#0.UseMI)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d8a2141ff98ee35cd1886f536ccc3548b012820b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp#L1786) removed operand 1, and entry #&llvm#8203;1.UseOpNo was no longer valid, resulting in an [assert](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/4a35214bddbb67f9597a500d48ab8c4fb25af150/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h#L452). This change defers constant folding until all operands have been updated so that UseOpNo values remain stable.

…), C)) (llvm#155141) Hi, I compared the following LLVM IR with GCC and Clang, and there is a small difference between the two. The LLVM IR is: ``` define i64 @test_smin_neg_one(i64 %a) { %1 = tail call i64 @llvm.smin.i64(i64 %a, i64 -1) %retval.0 = xor i64 %1, -1 ret i64 %retval.0 } ``` GCC generates: ``` cmp x0, 0 csinv x0, xzr, x0, ge ret ``` Clang generates: ``` cmn x0, #1 csinv x8, x0, xzr, lt mvn x0, x8 ret ``` Clang keeps flipping x0 through x8 unnecessarily. So I added the following folds to DAGCombiner: fold (xor (smax(x, C), C)) -> select (x > C), xor(x, C), 0 fold (xor (smin(x, C), C)) -> select (x < C), xor(x, C), 0 alive2: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/gffoir --------- Co-authored-by: Yui5427 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Simon Pilgrim <[email protected]>

llvm#158769) …52471)" This reverts commit e4eccd6. This was causing ASan failures in some situations involving unordered multimap containers. Details and a reproducer were posted on the original PR (llvm#152471).

@int3

In `Driver.cpp` `std::atomic<uint64_t>` is used which may need libatomic. Build failure (if that is of interest): ``` [127/135] Linking CXX shared library lib/liblldMachO.so.20.1 ninja: job failed: : && /usr/lib/ccache/bin/clang++-20 -fPIC -Os -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS=1 -D_LIBCPP_ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY_ANNOTATIONS=1 -D_LIBCPP_ENABLE_HARDENED_MODE=1 -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -g1 -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wl,--as-needed,-O1,--sort-common -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-z,nodelete -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/user/aports/main/lld20/src/lld-20.1.5.src/build/./lib -Wl,--gc-sections -shared -Wl,-soname,liblldMachO.so.20.1 -o lib/liblldMachO.so.20.1 MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Arch/ARM64.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Arch/ARM64Common.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Arch/ARM64_32.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Arch/X86_64.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/ConcatOutputSection.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Driver.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/DriverUtils.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Dwarf.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/EhFrame.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/ExportTrie.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/ICF.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/InputFiles.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/InputSection.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/LTO.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/MapFile.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/MarkLive.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/ObjC.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/OutputSection.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/OutputSegment.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Relocations.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/BPSectionOrderer.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/SectionPriorities.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Sections.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/SymbolTable.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Symbols.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/SyntheticSections.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Target.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/UnwindInfoSection.cpp.o MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Writer.cpp.o -L/usr/lib/llvm20/lib -Wl,-rpath,"\$ORIGIN/../lib:/usr/lib/llvm20/lib:/home/user/aports/main/lld20/src/lld-20.1.5.src/build/lib:" lib/liblldCommon.so.20.1 /usr/lib/llvm20/lib/libLLVM.so.20.1 && : /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/14.3.0/../../../../powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/bin/ld: MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Driver.cpp.o: in function `handleExplicitExports()': /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/14.3.0/../../../../include/c++/14.3.0/bits/atomic_base.h:501:(.text._ZL21handleExplicitExportsv+0xb8): undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8' /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/14.3.0/../../../../powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/14.3.0/../../../../include/c++/14.3.0/bits/atomic_base.h:501:(.text._ZL21handleExplicitExportsv+0x180): undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8' /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/14.3.0/../../../../powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/bin/ld: MachO/CMakeFiles/lldMachO.dir/Driver.cpp.o: in function `void llvm::function_ref<void (unsigned int)>::callback_fn<llvm::parallelForEach<lld::macho::Symbol* const*, handleExplicitExports()::$_0>(lld::macho::Symbol* const*, lld::macho::Symbol* const*, handleExplicitExports()::$_0)::{lambda(unsigned int)#1}>(int, unsigned int)': /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-alpine-linux-musl/14.3.0/../../../../include/c++/14.3.0/bits/atomic_base.h:631:(.text._ZN4llvm12function_refIFvjEE11callback_fnIZNS_15parallelForEachIPKPN3lld5macho6SymbolEZL21handleExplicitExportsvE3$_0EEvT_SC_T0_EUljE_EEvij+0xd4): undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8' clang++-20: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) ``` CC @int3 @gkmhub @smeenai Similar to llvm@f0b451c

llvm#164955 has a use-after-scope (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/16454): ``` ==mlir-opt==3940651==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address 0x6e1f6ba5c878 at pc 0x6336b214912a bp 0x7ffe607f1670 sp 0x7ffe607f1668 READ of size 4 at 0x6e1f6ba5c878 thread T0 #0 0x6336b2149129 in size /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:80:32 #1 0x6336b2149129 in operator[] /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:299:5 #2 0x6336b2149129 in populateBoundsForShapedValueDim /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/ValueBoundsOpInterfaceImpl.cpp:113:43 ... ``` This patch attempts to fix-forward by stack-allocating reassocIndices, instead of taking a reference to a return value.

## Summary Fix `FindProcesses` to respect Android's `hidepid=2` security model and enable name matching for Android apps. ## Problem 1. Called `adb shell pidof` or `adb shell ps` directly, bypassing Android's process visibility restrictions 2. Name matching failed for Android apps - searched for `com.example.myapp` but GDB Remote Protocol reports `app_process64` Android apps fork from Zygote, so `/proc/PID/exe` points to `app_process64` for all apps. The actual package name is only in `/proc/PID/cmdline`. The previous implementation applied name filters without supplementing with cmdline, so searches failed. ## Fix - Delegate to lldb-server via GDB Remote Protocol (respects `hidepid=2`) - Get all visible processes, supplement zygote/app_process entries with cmdline, then apply name matching - Only fetch cmdline for zygote apps (performance), parallelize with `xargs -P 8` - Remove redundant code (GDB Remote Protocol already provides GID/arch) ## Test Results ### Before this fix: ``` (lldb) platform process list error: no processes were found on the "remote-android" platform (lldb) platform process list -n com.example.hellojni 1 matching process was found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================ 5276 359 u0_a192 com.example.hellojni ^^^^^^^^ Missing triple! ``` ### After this fix: ``` (lldb) platform process list PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================ 1 0 root aarch64-unknown-linux-android init 2 0 root [kthreadd] 359 1 system aarch64-unknown-linux-android app_process64 5276 359 u0_a192 aarch64-unknown-linux-android com.example.hellojni 5357 5355 u0_a192 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh 5377 5370 u0_a192 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server ^^^^^^^^ User-space processes now have triples! (lldb) platform process list -n com.example.hellojni 1 matching process was found on "remote-android" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================ 5276 359 u0_a192 aarch64-unknown-linux-android com.example.hellojni (lldb) process attach -n com.example.hellojni Process 5276 stopped * thread #1, name = 'example.hellojni', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP ``` ## Test Plan With an Android device/emulator connected: 1. Start lldb-server on device: ```bash adb push lldb-server /data/local/tmp/ adb shell chmod +x /data/local/tmp/lldb-server adb shell /data/local/tmp/lldb-server platform --listen 127.0.0.1:9500 --server ``` 2. Connect from LLDB: ``` (lldb) platform select remote-android (lldb) platform connect connect://127.0.0.1:9500 (lldb) platform process list ``` 3. Verify: - `platform process list` returns all processes with triple information - `platform process list -n com.example.app` finds Android apps by package name - `process attach -n com.example.app` successfully attaches to Android apps ## Impact Restores `platform process list` on Android with architecture information and package name lookup. All name matching modes now work correctly. Fixes llvm#164192

…am (llvm#167724) This got exposed by `09262656f32ab3f2e1d82e5342ba37eecac52522`. The underlying stream of `m_os` is referenced by the `TextDiagnostic` member of `TextDiagnosticPrinter`. It got turned into a `llvm::formatted_raw_ostream` in the commit above. When `~TextDiagnosticPrinter` (and thus `~TextDiagnostic`) is invoked, we now call `~formatted_raw_ostream`, which tries to access the underlying stream. But `m_os` was already deleted because it is earlier in the order of destruction in `TextDiagnosticPrinter`. Move the `m_os` member before the `TextDiagnosticPrinter` to avoid a use-after-free. Drive-by: * Also move the `m_output` member which the `m_os` holds a reference to. The fact it's a reference indicates the expectation is most likely that the string outlives the stream. The ASAN macOS bot is currently failing with this: ``` 08:15:39 ================================================================= 08:15:39 ==61103==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60600012cf40 at pc 0x00012140d304 bp 0x00016eecc850 sp 0x00016eecc848 08:15:39 READ of size 8 at 0x60600012cf40 thread T0 08:15:39 #0 0x00012140d300 in llvm::formatted_raw_ostream::releaseStream() FormattedStream.h:205 08:15:39 #1 0x00012140d3a4 in llvm::formatted_raw_ostream::~formatted_raw_ostream() FormattedStream.h:145 08:15:39 #2 0x00012604abf8 in clang::TextDiagnostic::~TextDiagnostic() TextDiagnostic.cpp:721 08:15:39 llvm#3 0x00012605dc80 in clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter::~TextDiagnosticPrinter() TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp:30 08:15:39 llvm#4 0x00012605dd5c in clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter::~TextDiagnosticPrinter() TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp:27 08:15:39 llvm#5 0x0001231fb210 in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 llvm#6 0x0001231fb3bc in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 llvm#7 0x000129aa9d70 in clang::DiagnosticsEngine::~DiagnosticsEngine() Diagnostic.cpp:91 08:15:39 llvm#8 0x0001230436b8 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::DiagnosticsEngine>::Release() const IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:103 08:15:39 llvm#9 0x0001231fe6c8 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 08:15:39 llvm#10 0x0001231fe858 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 ... 08:15:39 08:15:39 0x60600012cf40 is located 32 bytes inside of 56-byte region [0x60600012cf20,0x60600012cf58) 08:15:39 freed by thread T0 here: 08:15:39 #0 0x0001018abb88 in _ZdlPv+0x74 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x4bb88) 08:15:39 #1 0x0001231fb1c0 in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 #2 0x0001231fb3bc in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 llvm#3 0x000129aa9d70 in clang::DiagnosticsEngine::~DiagnosticsEngine() Diagnostic.cpp:91 08:15:39 llvm#4 0x0001230436b8 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::DiagnosticsEngine>::Release() const IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:103 08:15:39 llvm#5 0x0001231fe6c8 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 08:15:39 llvm#6 0x0001231fe858 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 ... 08:15:39 08:15:39 previously allocated by thread T0 here: 08:15:39 #0 0x0001018ab760 in _Znwm+0x74 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x4b760) 08:15:39 #1 0x0001231f8dec in lldb_private::ClangModulesDeclVendor::Create(lldb_private::Target&) ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:732 08:15:39 #2 0x00012320af58 in lldb_private::ClangPersistentVariables::GetClangModulesDeclVendor() ClangPersistentVariables.cpp:124 08:15:39 llvm#3 0x0001232111f0 in lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::PrepareForParsing(lldb_private::DiagnosticManager&, lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, bool) ClangUserExpression.cpp:536 08:15:39 llvm#4 0x000123213790 in lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse(lldb_private::DiagnosticManager&, lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, lldb_private::ExecutionPolicy, bool, bool) ClangUserExpression.cpp:647 08:15:39 llvm#5 0x00012032b258 in lldb_private::UserExpression::Evaluate(lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ValueObject>&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>*, lldb_private::ValueObject*) UserExpression.cpp:280 08:15:39 llvm#6 0x000120724010 in lldb_private::Target::EvaluateExpression(llvm::StringRef, lldb_private::ExecutionContextScope*, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ValueObject>&, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>*, lldb_private::ValueObject*) Target.cpp:2905 08:15:39 llvm#7 0x00011fc7bde0 in lldb::SBTarget::EvaluateExpression(char const*, lldb::SBExpressionOptions const&) SBTarget.cpp:2305 08:15:39 ==61103==ABORTING ... ```

llvm#168105) …63019)" This reverts commit 92e5608.

llvm#168619) I've been working on some scripts that evaluate the parent and child frame. It's been very annoying that the parent frame has a property but not the child. So I've added this to the extensions, I would've preferred to return None, but because the existing impl returns an invalid SBFrame, so I'm conforming to that API. ``` (lldb) script Python Interactive Interpreter. To exit, type 'quit()', 'exit()' or Ctrl-D. >>> lldb.frame frame #0: 0x0000555555555200 fib.out`main >>> lldb.frame.parent frame #1: 0x00007ffff782a610 libc.so.6`__libc_start_call_main + 128 >>> lldb.frame.parent.child frame #0: 0x0000555555555200 fib.out`main ```

@printf

… errors (llvm#169989) We can see the following while running clang-repl in C mode ``` anutosh491@vv-nuc:/build/anutosh491/llvm-project/build/bin$ ./clang-repl --Xcc=-x --Xcc=c --Xcc=-std=c23 clang-repl> printf("hi\n"); In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_1:1:1: error: call to undeclared library function 'printf' with type 'int (const char *, ...)'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1 | printf("hi\n"); | ^ input_line_1:1:1: note: include the header <stdio.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'printf' error: Parsing failed. clang-repl> #include <stdio.h> hi ``` In debug mode while dumping the generated Module, i see this ``` clang-repl> printf("hi\n"); In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_1:1:1: error: call to undeclared library function 'printf' with type 'int (const char *, ...)'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1 | printf("hi\n"); | ^ input_line_1:1:1: note: include the header <stdio.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'printf' error: Parsing failed. clang-repl> #include <stdio.h> === compile-ptu 1 === [TU=0x55556cfbf830, M=0x55556cfc13a0 (incr_module_1)] [LLVM IR] ; ModuleID = 'incr_module_1' source_filename = "incr_module_1" target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @.str = private unnamed_addr constant [4 x i8] c"hi\0A\00", align 1 @llvm.global_ctors = appending global [1 x { i32, ptr, ptr }] [{ i32, ptr, ptr } { i32 65535, ptr @_GLOBAL__sub_I_incr_module_1, ptr null }] define internal void @__stmts__0() #0 { entry: %call = call i32 (ptr, ...) @printf(ptr noundef @.str) ret void } declare i32 @printf(ptr noundef, ...) #1 ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable define internal void @_GLOBAL__sub_I_incr_module_1() #2 section ".text.startup" { entry: call void @__stmts__0() ret void } attributes #0 = { "min-legal-vector-width"="0" } attributes #1 = { "frame-pointer"="all" "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+cmov,+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87" "tune-cpu"="generic" } attributes #2 = { noinline nounwind uwtable "frame-pointer"="all" "min-legal-vector-width"="0" "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+cmov,+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87" "tune-cpu"="generic" } !llvm.module.flags = !{!0, !1, !2, !3, !4} !llvm.ident = !{!5} !0 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4} !1 = !{i32 8, !"PIC Level", i32 2} !2 = !{i32 7, !"PIE Level", i32 2} !3 = !{i32 7, !"uwtable", i32 2} !4 = !{i32 7, !"frame-pointer", i32 2} !5 = !{!"clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/anutosh491/llvm-project.git 81ad8fb)"} === end compile-ptu === execute-ptu 1: [TU=0x55556cfbf830, M=0x55556cfc13a0 (incr_module_1)] hi ``` Basically I see that CodeGen emits IR for a cell before we know whether DiagnosticsEngine has an error. For C code like `printf("hi\n");` without <stdio.h>, Sema emits a diagnostic but still produces a "codegen-able" `TopLevelStmt`, so the `printf` call is IR-generated into the current module. Previously, when `Diags.hasErrorOccurred()` was true, we only cleaned up the PTU AST and left the CodeGen module untouched. The next successful cell then called `GenModule()`, which returned that same module (now also containing the next cell’s IR), causing side effects from the failed cell (e.g. printf)

…lvm#159480) When building rustc std for arm64e, core fails to compile successfully with the error: ``` Constant ValueID not recognized. UNREACHABLE executed at rust/src/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/FunctionComparator.cpp:523! ``` This is a result of function merging so I modified FunctionComparator.cpp as the ConstantPtrAuth value would go unchecked in the switch statement. The test case is a reduction from the failure in core and fails on main with: ``` ******************** FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll (59809 of 59995) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stdout): -- # RUN: at line 3 /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt -S -passes=mergefunc < /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll | /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll # executed command: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt -S -passes=mergefunc # .---command stderr------------ # | Constant ValueID not recognized. # | UNREACHABLE executed at /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/FunctionComparator.cpp:523! # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace and instructions to reproduce the bug. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt -S -passes=mergefunc # | 1. Running pass "mergefunc" on module "<stdin>" # | #0 0x0000000103335770 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102651770) # | #1 0x00000001033336bc llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x10264f6bc) # | #2 0x0000000103336218 SignalHandler(int, __siginfo*, void*) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102652218) # | llvm#3 0x000000018e6c16a4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x1804ad6a4) # | llvm#4 0x000000018e68788c (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+0x18047388c) # | llvm#5 0x000000018e590a3c (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x18037ca3c) # | llvm#6 0x00000001032a84bc llvm::install_out_of_memory_new_handler() (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1025c44bc) # | llvm#7 0x00000001033b37c0 llvm::FunctionComparator::cmpMDNode(llvm::MDNode const*, llvm::MDNode const*) const (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1026cf7c0) # | llvm#8 0x00000001033b4d90 llvm::FunctionComparator::cmpBasicBlocks(llvm::BasicBlock const*, llvm::BasicBlock const*) const (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1026d0d90) # | llvm#9 0x00000001033b5234 llvm::FunctionComparator::compare() (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1026d1234) # | llvm#10 0x0000000102d6d868 (anonymous namespace)::MergeFunctions::insert(llvm::Function*) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102089868) # | llvm#11 0x0000000102d6bc0c llvm::MergeFunctionsPass::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102087c0c) # | llvm#12 0x0000000102d6b430 llvm::MergeFunctionsPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102087430) # | llvm#13 0x0000000102b90558 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x101eac558) # | llvm#14 0x0000000103734bc4 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::__1::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102a50bc4) # | llvm#15 0x000000010373cc28 optMain (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102a58c28) # | llvm#16 0x000000018e2e6b98 # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: -6 # executed command: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll # .---command stderr------------ # | FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. # | FileCheck command line: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 2 ```

CHR builds the merged hot-path predicate with IRBuilder::CreateLogicalAnd. That helper is implemented as a select and can constant-fold to a non- Instruction (e.g. i1 true). The pass then attempted to mark the merged condition as having explicitly unknown branch weights when profile data is present, but it unconditionally did cast<Instruction>(MergedCondition), which can crash in release builds. Guard the metadata update with dyn_cast<Instruction> and pass the containing Function explicitly to avoid calling Instruction::getFunction when the value is not attached yet. Add a regression test that exercises the constant-folding case. Crashing stack: ``` 2. Running pass "chr" on function "repro_crash" #0 0x0000000003be00a4 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (bin/opt+0x3be00a4) #1 0x0000000003bdd9e8 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (bin/opt+0x3bdd9e8) #2 0x0000000003be1300 SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) Signals.cpp:0:0 llvm#3 0x0000ffffa8e1d840 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x840) llvm#4 0x0000000003c815e0 llvm::Instruction::getFunction() const (bin/opt+0x3c815e0) llvm#5 0x0000000003dcd35c llvm::setExplicitlyUnknownBranchWeightsIfProfiled(llvm::Instruction&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::Function const*) (bin/opt+0x3dcd35c) llvm#6 0x0000000004fb3670 (anonymous namespace)::CHR::addToMergedCondition(bool, llvm::Value*, llvm::Instruction*, (anonymous namespace)::CHRScope*, llvm::IRBuilder<llvm::ConstantFolder, llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter>&, llvm::Value*&) ControlHeightReduction.cpp:0:0 llvm#7 0x0000000004fa7d88 (anonymous namespace)::CHR::run() ControlHeightReduction.cpp:0:0 llvm#8 0x0000000004fa3618 llvm::ControlHeightReductionPass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) (bin/opt+0x4fa3618) ``` Tests: opt < llvm/test/Transforms/PGOProfile/chr-unknown-profdata-crash.ll -passes='require<profile-summary>,function(chr)' -force-chr -chr-merge-threshold=1 -disable-output

…ng destructor (llvm#174082)" This reverts commit 7976ac9. This is causing msan failures. msan-track-origins stack trace: ==9441==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x55c20df74ad3 in clang::interp::Pointer::operator=(clang::interp::Pointer&&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp:137:7 #1 0x55c20db81010 in bool clang::interp::InitGlobal<(clang::interp::PrimType)13, clang::interp::Pointer>(clang::interp::InterpState&, clang::interp::CodePtr, unsigned int) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.h:1478:16 #2 0x55c20db7ec56 in emitInitGlobalPtr blaze-out/k8-fastbuild-msan/bin/llvm-project/clang/_virtual_includes/ast_bytecode_opcodes_gen/Opcodes.inc:26162:10 llvm#3 0x55c20db7ec56 in clang::interp::EvalEmitter::emitInitGlobal(clang::interp::PrimType, unsigned int, clang::interp::SourceInfo) blaze-out/k8-fastbuild-msan/bin/llvm-project/clang/_virtual_includes/ast_bytecode_opcodes_gen/Opcodes.inc:26042:12 llvm#4 0x55c20da58b87 in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visitVarDecl(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:4924:20 llvm#5 0x55c20da64a61 in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visitDeclAndReturn(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:4831:14 llvm#6 0x55c20da7f290 in clang::interp::EvalEmitter::interpretDecl(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/EvalEmitter.cpp:66:14 llvm#7 0x55c20d970d23 in clang::interp::Context::evaluateAsInitializer(clang::interp::State&, clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, clang::APValue&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Context.cpp:141:16 llvm#8 0x55c20e25b8de in clang::Expr::EvaluateAsInitializer(clang::APValue&, clang::ASTContext const&, clang::VarDecl const*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::__msan::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic>>&, bool) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:20754:20 llvm#9 0x55c20da368d5 in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visitDeclRef(clang::ValueDecl const*, clang::Expr const*) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:7162:19 llvm#10 0x55c20da34986 in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::VisitDeclRefExpr(clang::DeclRefExpr const*) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:7192:16 llvm#11 0x55c20da66666 in clang::StmtVisitorBase<llvm::make_const_ptr, clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>, bool>::Visit(clang::Stmt const*) blaze-out/k8-fastbuild-msan/bin/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/StmtNodes.inc:474:1 llvm#12 0x55c20da65d3f in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visit(clang::Expr const*) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:4293:16 llvm#13 0x55c20da57348 in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::VisitCXXTypeidExpr(clang::CXXTypeidExpr const*) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:3893:14 llvm#14 0x55c20da66760 in clang::StmtVisitorBase<llvm::make_const_ptr, clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>, bool>::Visit(clang::Stmt const*) blaze-out/k8-fastbuild-msan/bin/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/StmtNodes.inc:658:1 llvm#15 0x55c20da65d3f in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visit(clang::Expr const*) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:4293:16 llvm#16 0x55c20da58afc in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visitVarDecl(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:4921:18 llvm#17 0x55c20da64a61 in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visitDeclAndReturn(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:4831:14 llvm#18 0x55c20da7f290 in clang::interp::EvalEmitter::interpretDecl(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/EvalEmitter.cpp:66:14 llvm#19 0x55c20d970d23 in clang::interp::Context::evaluateAsInitializer(clang::interp::State&, clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, clang::APValue&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Context.cpp:141:16 llvm#20 0x55c20e25b8de in clang::Expr::EvaluateAsInitializer(clang::APValue&, clang::ASTContext const&, clang::VarDecl const*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::__msan::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic>>&, bool) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:20754:20 llvm#21 0x55c20dfdcc38 in clang::VarDecl::evaluateValueImpl(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::__msan::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic>>&, bool) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp:2608:23 llvm#22 0x55c20dfdd1a2 in clang::VarDecl::checkForConstantInitialization(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::__msan::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic>>&) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp:2687:7 llvm#23 0x55c20b9154da in clang::Sema::CheckCompleteVariableDeclaration(clang::VarDecl*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14941:27 llvm#24 0x55c20b910f36 in clang::Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(clang::Decl*, clang::Expr*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14280:3 llvm#25 0x55c20ad044ee in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(clang::Declarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2639:17 llvm#26 0x55c20acfe9f8 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo&, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2356:7 llvm#27 0x55c20abd8a43 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1181:10 llvm#28 0x55c20abd7654 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1203:12 llvm#29 0x55c20abd4d9c in clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1031:14 llvm#30 0x55c20ac96f31 in clang::Parser::ParseInnerNamespace(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Parser::InnerNamespaceInfo, 4u> const&, unsigned int, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::BalancedDelimiterTracker&) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp:240:7 llvm#31 0x55c20ac950c7 in clang::Parser::ParseNamespace(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::SourceLocation) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp:218:3 llvm#32 0x55c20acfb09b in clang::Parser::ParseDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::SourceLocation*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:1909:12 llvm#33 0x55c20abd3f88 in clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp llvm#34 0x55c20abcfe33 in clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, clang::Sema::ModuleImportState&) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:744:12 llvm#35 0x55c20abb214e in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:170:20 llvm#36 0x55c20a90adaa in clang::ASTFrontendAction::ExecuteAction() llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1432:3 llvm#37 0x55c20a9095bf in clang::FrontendAction::Execute() llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1312:3 llvm#38 0x55c20a76cdc7 in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1004:33 llvm#39 0x55c20805aab0 in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:310:25 llvm#40 0x55c20802e823 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:304:15 llvm#41 0x55c2080218ec in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::FileSystem>) llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:225:12 llvm#42 0x55c20801ea91 in clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:268:12 llvm#43 0x55c20801a6af in main blaze-out/k8-fastbuild-msan/bin/llvm-project/clang/clang-driver.cpp:17:10 llvm#44 0x7f79c4214351 in __libc_start_main (/usr/libc/lib64/libc.so.6+0x61351) (BuildId: ca23ec6d935352118622ce674a8bb52d) llvm#45 0x55c207f8c2e9 in _start /usr/libc/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 Member fields were destroyed #0 0x55c207f9f5fd in __sanitizer_dtor_callback_fields llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1074:5 #1 0x55c20df74380 in ~Pointer llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.h:826:12 #2 0x55c20df74380 in clang::interp::Pointer::~Pointer() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp:93:1 llvm#3 0x55c20da7c5ab in void dtorTy<clang::interp::Pointer>(clang::interp::Block*, std::byte*, clang::interp::Descriptor const*) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Descriptor.cpp:49:32 llvm#4 0x55c20d976b91 in clang::interp::Block::invokeDtor() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBlock.h:149:7 llvm#5 0x55c20da651a1 in clang::interp::Compiler<clang::interp::EvalEmitter>::visitDeclAndReturn(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp:4869:22 llvm#6 0x55c20da7f290 in clang::interp::EvalEmitter::interpretDecl(clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/EvalEmitter.cpp:66:14 llvm#7 0x55c20d970d23 in clang::interp::Context::evaluateAsInitializer(clang::interp::State&, clang::VarDecl const*, clang::Expr const*, clang::APValue&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Context.cpp:141:16 llvm#8 0x55c20e25b8de in clang::Expr::EvaluateAsInitializer(clang::APValue&, clang::ASTContext const&, clang::VarDecl const*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::__msan::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic>>&, bool) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:20754:20 llvm#9 0x55c20dfdcc38 in clang::VarDecl::evaluateValueImpl(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::__msan::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic>>&, bool) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp:2608:23 llvm#10 0x55c20dfdd1a2 in clang::VarDecl::checkForConstantInitialization(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::__msan::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic>>&) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp:2687:7 llvm#11 0x55c20b9154da in clang::Sema::CheckCompleteVariableDeclaration(clang::VarDecl*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14941:27 llvm#12 0x55c20b910f36 in clang::Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(clang::Decl*, clang::Expr*, bool) llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14280:3 llvm#13 0x55c20ad044ee in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(clang::Declarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2639:17 llvm#14 0x55c20acfe9f8 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo&, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2356:7 llvm#15 0x55c20abd8a43 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1181:10 llvm#16 0x55c20abd7654 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1203:12 llvm#17 0x55c20abd4d9c in clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1031:14 llvm#18 0x55c20ac96f31 in clang::Parser::ParseInnerNamespace(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Parser::InnerNamespaceInfo, 4u> const&, unsigned int, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::BalancedDelimiterTracker&) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp:240:7 llvm#19 0x55c20ac950c7 in clang::Parser::ParseNamespace(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::SourceLocation) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp:218:3 llvm#20 0x55c20acfb09b in clang::Parser::ParseDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::SourceLocation*) llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:1909:12

…lvm#175807) A buildbot was failing with a use-after-poison (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/16530) after llvm#175050: ``` ==llc==1532559==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0xe26e74e12368 at pc 0xb36d41bd74dc bp 0xffffed72a450 sp 0xffffed72a448 READ of size 8 at 0xe26e74e12368 thread T0 #0 0xb36d41bd74d8 in llvm::MachineInstr::print(llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool, bool, bool, llvm::TargetInstrInfo const*) const /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp:1796:35 #1 0xb36d3e221b08 in operator<< /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h:2150:6 #2 0xb36d3e221b08 in llvm::PreRARematStage::rollback(llvm::PreRARematStage::RollbackInfo const&, llvm::BitVector&) const /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/GCNSchedStrategy.cpp:2363:57 ... ``` This is because it was printing an instruction that had already been deleted. This patch fixes this by reversing the order.

labrinea force-pushed the allow-fmv-without-default-declaration branch from e8c659e to ec2af3b Compare March 19, 2024 17:40

labrinea force-pushed the allow-fmv-without-default-declaration branch from ec2af3b to 63585c5 Compare March 19, 2024 17:46

labrinea mentioned this pull request Mar 19, 2024

[FMV] Emit the resolver along with the default version definition. llvm/llvm-project#84405

Merged

jroelofs reviewed Mar 19, 2024

View reviewed changes

jroelofs approved these changes Mar 19, 2024

View reviewed changes

labrinea force-pushed the fmv-emit-resolver-along-default-version-def branch from 6a49501 to 20a44fd Compare March 20, 2024 11:46

labrinea force-pushed the fmv-emit-resolver-along-default-version-def branch from 20a44fd to c0c07de Compare March 20, 2024 15:54

labrinea deleted the branch fmv-emit-resolver-along-default-version-def March 21, 2024 10:40

labrinea closed this Mar 21, 2024

labrinea mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2024

[FMV] Allow multi versioning without default declaration. llvm/llvm-project#85454

Merged

labrinea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025

Revert "[Transform][LoadStoreVectorizer] allow redundant in Chain (#1… (

a407d02

llvm#168105) …63019)" This reverts commit 92e5608.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[FMV] Allow multi versioning without default declaration. #1

[FMV] Allow multi versioning without default declaration. #1

Uh oh!

labrinea commented Mar 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

jroelofs Mar 19, 2024

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

	llvm::Constant *Func = createFunction(NewFD);
	auto *Func = cast<llvm::Function>(createFunction(NewFD));

[FMV] Allow multi versioning without default declaration. #1

[FMV] Allow multi versioning without default declaration. #1

Uh oh!

Conversation

labrinea commented Mar 16, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jroelofs Mar 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

labrinea commented Mar 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading