Replace deprecated strings.Title with cases.Title

[nmn3m]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup
/kind deprecation

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR replaces all usages of the deprecated strings.Title function with cases.Title(language.English).String(...) from golang.org/x/text/cases. This ensures proper Unicode handling and follows Go's recommended best practices for string title-casing.

Which issue(s) this PR is related to:

Fixes #133154 (Deprecated Usage of strings.Title in ServiceCheck.Name())

Special notes for your reviewer:

• Refactoring only; no user-facing changes.
• All tests pass locally.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label and removing any existing "release-note-none" label because there is a "kind/deprecation" label on the PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @nmn3m. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-triage-robot]

This PR may require API review.

If so, when the changes are ready, complete the pre-review checklist and request an API review.

Status of requested reviews is tracked in the API Review project.

[soltysh]

both the controller and kubectl bits are good

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 0ff24ef4ea4f687d3359870fbb38252f7c2184ed

[nmn3m]

ping @liggitt as per here
/assign @liggitt

[deads2k]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, janetkuo, neolit123, nmn3m, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [soltysh]
• cmd/kubeadm/OWNERS [neolit123]
• pkg/controller/statefulset/OWNERS [deads2k,janetkuo,soltysh]
• staging/src/k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver/OWNERS [deads2k,soltysh]
• staging/src/k8s.io/apiserver/OWNERS [deads2k,soltysh]
• staging/src/k8s.io/component-base/OWNERS [soltysh]
• staging/src/k8s.io/component-base/config/OWNERS [deads2k]
• staging/src/k8s.io/kubectl/OWNERS [soltysh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[pacoxu]

/release-note-none

[k8s-ci-robot]

@pacoxu: you can not set the release note label to "release-note-none" because the PR has the label "kind/deprecation".

In response to this:

/release-note-none

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[pacoxu]

/remove-kind deprecation
Deprecation label is for enhancements in deprecation stage.

[pacoxu]

/release-note-none

[pacoxu]

/retest

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

• The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
• The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
• The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
• The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
• The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

• Review the full test history for this PR
• Prevent this bot from retesting with /lgtm cancel or /hold
• Help make our tests less flaky by following our Flaky Tests Guide

/retest

[nmn3m]

/retest