Load CapacityBuffer resource to schema#9135
Conversation
Event recorder requires the resource to be registered in the schema. Otherwise it fails to send an event.
|
Hi @norbertcyran. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/assign abdelrahman882 BigDarkClown |
|
/lgtm |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abdelrahman882, BigDarkClown, norbertcyran The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
jackfrancis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/cherry-pick cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35
|
cherry-pick cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35 |
|
/cherry-pick cluster-autoscaler-release-1.35 sigh |
|
@jackfrancis: new pull request created: #9169 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Event recorder requires the resource to be registered in the schema. Otherwise it fails to send an event.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: