Skip to content

Conversation

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Sep 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 29, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing label Sep 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Sep 29, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @fabriziopandini @chrischdi

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 7639a0f59d92e7de6300ea074047a8b0f19dd541

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 29, 2025
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer should we backport this to the 1.11 branch?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 552b022 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 29, 2025
22 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.12 milestone Sep 29, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented Sep 30, 2025

@sbueringer should we backport this to the 1.11 branch?

Up to you (doesn't hurt, but I'm personally not planning to keep autoscaler in e2e tests up-to-date across 2 repos and 2 branches each)

@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-bump-autoscaler-1.34 branch September 30, 2025 07:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants