Skip to content

Conversation

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Aug 8, 2025

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:
xref: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C7J9RP96G/p1754649416231049?thread_ts=1751991861.631429&cid=C7J9RP96G

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #12449

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 8, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing label Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 8, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

1 similar comment
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] 🌱 Enable IPv6 test again 🌱 Enable IPv6 test again Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 8, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/approve

/assign @adilGhaffarDev @mboersma

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 8, 2025
@adilGhaffarDev
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 821156e0cffa08efc4d1230fb2dc365d9da52932

@sbueringer sbueringer removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit af7e245 into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 8, 2025
24 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.12 milestone Aug 8, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-reenable-ipv6 branch August 9, 2025 05:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Failing e2e tests due to networking conformance test

4 participants