Skip to content

remove hasOwnProperty call #183

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
blakeembrey merged 4 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

remove hasOwnProperty call #183

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
44f6e63
remove hasownproperty call
gurgunday Oct 8, 2024
dfa910c
remove undefined check
gurgunday Oct 8, 2024
90dd8e0
Allow undefined in type
blakeembrey Oct 8, 2024
a56d27f
Update parse return type
blakeembrey Oct 8, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions src/index.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ const domainValueRegExp =
const pathValueRegExp = /^[\u0020-\u003A\u003D-\u007E]*$/;

const __toString = Object.prototype.toString;
const __hasOwnProperty = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;

const NullObject = /* @__PURE__ */ (() => {
const C = function () {};
Expand All @@ -82,7 +81,7 @@ export interface ParseOptions {
*
* @default decodeURIComponent
*/
decode?: (str: string) => string | undefined;
Comment thread
blakeembrey marked this conversation as resolved.
decode?: (str: string) => string;
}

/**
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -121,7 +120,7 @@ export function parse(
const key = str.slice(keyStartIdx, keyEndIdx);

// only assign once
if (!__hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
if (obj[key] === undefined) {

@blakeembrey blakeembrey Oct 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you double check performance? I didn’t change this because my numbers were worse doing the undefined check.

@gurgunday gurgunday Oct 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, let me bench it

@blakeembrey blakeembrey Oct 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bench LGTM, would you be free to rebase on main and remove the if (value !== undefined) now? Since it won't matter if dec returns undefined from #179.

let valStartIdx = startIndex(str, eqIdx + 1, endIdx);
let valEndIdx = endIndex(str, endIdx, valStartIdx);

Expand All @@ -134,7 +133,8 @@ export function parse(
}

const value = dec(str.slice(valStartIdx, valEndIdx));
if (value !== undefined) obj[key] = value;

obj[key] = value;
}

index = endIdx + 1;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ export function serialize(
/**
* URL-decode string value. Optimized to skip native call when no %.
*/
function decode(str: string): string | undefined {
function decode(str: string): string {
if (str.indexOf("%") === -1) return str;

try {
Expand Down