Skip to content

[SYCL] Disable execution range rounding for ESIMD kernel in runtime #2951

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
romanovvlad merged 4 commits into from
Dec 28, 2020
Merged

[SYCL] Disable execution range rounding for ESIMD kernel in runtime #2951

Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
2132a69
[SYCL] Disable execution range rounding for ESIMD kernel in runtime
Dec 24, 2020
5ab4159
Merge branch 'sycl' into private/s-kanaev/disable-pf-rounding-4-esimd
Dec 24, 2020
072fd82
[SYCL] Reworked workaround solution
Dec 24, 2020
27ac705
[SYCL] Apply comments
Dec 25, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion sycl/include/CL/sycl/handler.hpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -760,9 +760,11 @@ class __SYCL_EXPORT handler {
typename std::conditional<std::is_integral<LambdaArgType>::value &&
Dims == 1,
item<Dims>, LambdaArgType>::type;

using NameT =
typename detail::get_kernel_name_t<KernelName, KernelType>::name;

#ifndef __SYCL_EXPLICIT_SIMD__
Copy link
Contributor

@kbobrovs kbobrovs Dec 25, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the quick patch. I think we all agree that this is a band-aid rather than a fix. Please add a TODO/FIXME.
Note that __SYCL_EXPLICIT_SIMD__ will soon be gone.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@s-kanaev s-kanaev Dec 25, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we all agree that this is a band-aid rather than a fix

Sure thing.

Added a FIXME.
What will be used instead of __SYCL_EXPLICIT_SIMD__?

Copy link
Contributor

@DenisBakhvalov DenisBakhvalov Dec 26, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What will be used instead of __SYCL_EXPLICIT_SIMD__?

We plan to unify SYCL and ESIMD modes and will get read of -fsycl-explicit-simd option and __SYCL_EXPLICIT_SIMD__ macro. So, both types of kernels can coexist in the same translation unit and in the same program.

// The work group size preferred by this device.
// A reasonable choice for rounding up the range is 32.
constexpr size_t GoodLocalSizeX = 32;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -827,7 +829,9 @@ class __SYCL_EXPORT handler {
std::move(Wrapper));
MCGType = detail::CG::KERNEL;
#endif
} else {
} else
#endif // __SYCL_EXPLICIT_SIMD__
{
#ifdef __SYCL_DEVICE_ONLY__
(void)NumWorkItems;
kernel_parallel_for<NameT, TransformedArgType>(KernelFunc);
Expand Down