You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪
🎫 No ticket provided
Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status: Passed
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities
Status: Passed
⚪
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance.
Status: Missing Auditing: The added call to updatePilotAndCraftNames() (line 3740) introduces a user-facing update without any accompanying audit logging, and it is unclear whether this action is logged elsewhere.
Referred Code
updatePilotAndCraftNames();}));
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation
Status: Unhandled Errors: The new sequencing adds updatePilotAndCraftNames() after GUI.content_ready(callback) without visible error handling if the update fails or required data is absent.
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪
🎫 No ticket provided
Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status: Passed
⚪
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance.
Status: No audit logs: The added call to updatePilotAndCraftNames() appears to change user-visible names without any added auditing or logging to track this potentially sensitive action.
Referred Code
updatePilotAndCraftNames();}));
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation
Status: Missing error handling: The new invocation of updatePilotAndCraftNames() lacks local error handling or fallback behavior if the function fails or required data is unavailable.
Referred Code
updatePilotAndCraftNames();}));
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities
Status: Input assumptions: Calling updatePilotAndCraftNames() may consume external/user-provided names, but the new code adds no validation or sanitization at this call site.
Await asynchronous operation to prevent race conditions
To prevent a race condition, wrap the asynchronous mspHelper.loadOsdCustomElements call in a promise and await its completion before proceeding with subsequent UI updates.
[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential race condition where UI readiness is signaled before an asynchronous operation completes, and proposes a valid solution to ensure proper execution order.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
Bug fix
Description
Reordered function calls to fix OSD page loading
Moved
updatePilotAndCraftNames()afterGUI.content_ready()Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
osd.js
Reorder initialization function calls for proper loadingtabs/osd.js
updatePilotAndCraftNames()call to execute afterGUI.content_ready(callback)instead of before