This is more of a suggestion than a bug, but it would appear that modelling mimetypes as anything other than raw strings is ridiculous overkill. Maybe some alternative method can be found where they are represented as a tuple (mimetype, attributes) instead?
This is more of a suggestion than a bug, but it would appear that modelling mimetypes as anything other than raw strings is ridiculous overkill. Maybe some alternative method can be found where they are represented as a tuple
(mimetype, attributes)instead?