Skip to content

[doc] nested markup is invalid in rst#9898

Merged
sgugger merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
stas00-patch-4
Jan 30, 2021
Merged

[doc] nested markup is invalid in rst#9898
sgugger merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
stas00-patch-4

Conversation

@stas00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stas00 stas00 commented Jan 30, 2021

Apparently nested markup in RST is invalid: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/FAQ.html#is-nested-inline-markup-possible

So currently this line doesn't get rendered properly, leaving inner markdown unrendered, resulting in:

You can create a model repo directly from `the /new page on the website <https://huggingface.co/new>`__.

This PR removes the bold markdown which fixes the link.

@sgugger

Apparently nested markup in RST is invalid: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/FAQ.html#is-nested-inline-markup-possible

So currently this line doesn't get rendered properly, leaving inner markdown unrendered, resulting in:
```
https://docutils.sourceforge.io/FAQ.html#is-nested-inline-markup-possible
```

This PR removes the bold which fixes the link.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@sgugger sgugger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing!

@sgugger sgugger merged commit 40cfc35 into master Jan 30, 2021
@sgugger sgugger deleted the stas00-patch-4 branch January 30, 2021 14:59
Qbiwan pushed a commit to Qbiwan/transformers that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2021
Apparently nested markup in RST is invalid: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/FAQ.html#is-nested-inline-markup-possible

So currently this line doesn't get rendered properly, leaving inner markdown unrendered, resulting in:
```
https://docutils.sourceforge.io/FAQ.html#is-nested-inline-markup-possible
```

This PR removes the bold which fixes the link.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants