-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
Rework some TF tests #8492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Rework some TF tests #8492
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0ffb70a
Update some tests
jplu e3db061
Small update
jplu 7703eac
Apply style
jplu 677e1cf
Use max_position_embeddings
jplu be9a9bd
Create a fake attribute
jplu 1f6ea35
Create a fake attribute
jplu 3c59788
Update wrong name
jplu 84f3ef5
Wrong TransfoXL model file
jplu 9231863
Keep the common tests agnostic
jplu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Replace 2000 by 512 here because all the models but Longformer take at most 512 tokens. Also keeping 2000 here will raise an error in the future embedding layers for these models limited to 512 tokens.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can put it to
self.model_tester.max_position_embeddingsso that it is model specific?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very good idea!! Just done it!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LysandreJik apparently XLNet, TransfoXL and T5 have not a
max_position_embeddingsattribute in their config (which is normal). Should I add the parameter manually in the test class?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I did not take this into account. Giving them a
max_position_embeddingswouldn't be wise, though, as they actually do not have such a limitation.I guess here the best approach would be to get a
max_position_embeddings, and if they don't have it (they're using relative position embeddings), then set a default of 512 for the sake of this test only.That means something like
getattr(self.model_tester, "max_position_embeddings", 512).What do you think? This way it stays model-agnostic, but doesn't add the model_tester attribute
max_position_embeddingsas it doesn't belong here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perfect! I like it 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Like this?