Skip to content

Conversation

@kubawi
Copy link
Contributor

@kubawi kubawi commented Jun 18, 2025

Adds a little test that stresses the new interned regexp library by compiling and accessing the same pattern from a hundred goroutines.

PCI review checklist

  • If applicable, I've documented a plan to revert these changes if they require more than reverting the pull request.

  • If applicable, I've worked with GRC to document the impact of any changes to security controls.

    Examples of changes to controls include access controls, encryption, logging, etc.

  • If applicable, I've worked with GRC to ensure compliance due to a significant change to the in-scope PCI environment.

    Examples include changes to operating systems, ports, protocols, services, cryptography-related components, PII processing code, etc.

@kubawi kubawi self-assigned this Jun 18, 2025
guygrigsby
guygrigsby previously approved these changes Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Member

@guygrigsby guygrigsby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

raskchanky
raskchanky previously approved these changes Jun 18, 2025
Copy link

@raskchanky raskchanky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kubawi kubawi dismissed stale reviews from raskchanky and guygrigsby via 3c26b08 June 18, 2025 23:29
@kubawi kubawi requested a review from raskchanky June 18, 2025 23:33
raskchanky
raskchanky previously approved these changes Jun 19, 2025
@kubawi kubawi force-pushed the kubawi/VAULT-34754/add-a-concurrency-test-to-regexp-package branch from 2cd7b54 to 668bc83 Compare October 8, 2025 13:20
@kubawi kubawi requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2025 13:20
sgmiller
sgmiller previously approved these changes Oct 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sgmiller sgmiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need the entire license in here since it's in the parent (the whole project?)

Otherwise lgtm

@kubawi kubawi dismissed stale reviews from sgmiller and raskchanky via dfdfa51 October 10, 2025 12:05
@kubawi
Copy link
Contributor Author

kubawi commented Oct 10, 2025

Do we need the entire license in here since it's in the parent (the whole project?)

Otherwise lgtm

Good catch, thanks! Fixed in dfdfa51.

@kubawi kubawi requested a review from sgmiller October 10, 2025 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants